Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31342877›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

A Survey Study Evaluating and Comparing the Health Literacy Knowledge and Communication Skills Used by Nurses and Physicians.

Müberra Devrim Güner, Perihan Elif Ekmekci

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nurses' Knowledge of Rare Diseases: A Systematic Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Health Literacy Among German Health Professionals-To-Be - Exploratory Pilot Study].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2022
    Article
  17. COVID-19-Related Health Literacy of School Leaders in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Factors Affecting Employees Work Engagement in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Professional Responsiveness to Health Literacy: A Scoping Review.Health literacy research and practice · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Müberra Devrim Güner1 Departments of Medical Pharmacology, TOBB Economy and Technology University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6982-9026
Perihan Elif Ekmekci2 Departments of History of Medicine and Ethics, TOBB Economy and Technology University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
TOBB University of Economics and Technology · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health literacy (HL) is considered as an interaction between the demands of health systems and the skills of individuals. The current global approach demands health professionals to be more accountable for universal precautions approach and improve communication skills, and employ strategies to confirm patients' understanding. The aim of this study is to assess the knowledge and attitude of health care professionals (HCPs) about HL and their communication skills, and its effect on their practices, and to compare the findings among subgroups of HCPs. An online cross-sectional survey involving 29 items was developed for sociodemographic and professional characteristics and knowledge, attitude, and practices evaluation. Health care professionals reached by occupational organizations and social media platforms. Among the 277 participants that answered the questions, 184 were physicians and 78 were nurses, and 37.99% of physicians and 18.42% nurses heard about the term "HL" through this survey. Most of the participants stated their willingness to receive information/training on the subject and that knowing HL level would change their approach to and outcomes of the patients. Nurses were using a variety of methods that improve communication with patients and considered HCPs' lack of knowledge of the concept of "HL" and their neglect of HL as obstacles to its evaluation more than physicians. These results emphasize the urgent need of initiatives to be taken to improve the awareness of HCPs of HL and the subsequent incorporation of these initiatives into the daily health care services they provide. Nurses' awareness of HL is higher and they are already better at incorporating HL-sensitive items into their practices. Both graduate and continuing education programs need to be modified to improve HL knowledge of all HCPs and its positive effects on health care. The current structure of the roles and responsibilities of these professions needs to be improved to make it more HL sensitive.

Indexed as

ComprehensionHealth CommunicationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, ContinuingFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedNursesPhysiciansProfessional-Patient RelationsSurveys and Questionnairesattitudeawarenesscontinuing educationdecision makinghealth communicationhealth literacyhealth services needs and demandhealth workforcesocial skillssurveys

Identifiers

PMID31342877
PMCPMC6659174
OpenAlexW2963550943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.