ArticleBiomacromolecules2019
Nonviral Nanoparticles for CRISPR-Based Genome Editing: Is It Just a Simple Adaption of What Have Been Developed for Nucleic Acid Delivery?
Article in Biomacromolecules, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Programmable Hydrogels: Frontiers in Dynamic Closed-Loop Systems, Biomimetic Synergy, and Clinical Translation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Exploring Advanced CRISPR Delivery Technologies for Therapeutic Genome Editing.Small science · 2024Article
- CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing for Tissue-Specific In Vivo Targeting: Nanomaterials and Translational Perspective.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- The current landscape of microRNAs (miRNAs) in bacterial pneumonia: opportunities and challenges.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2022Review
- Inherent and Composite Hydrogels as Promising Materials to Limit Antimicrobial Resistance.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Calcium-based nanomaterials and their interrelation with chitosan: optimization for pCRISPR delivery.Journal of nanostructure in chemistry · 2022Article
- The significance of bioengineered nanoplatforms against SARS-CoV-2: From detection to genome editing.Life sciences · 2021Review
- Lipid nanoparticle-mediated codelivery of Cas9 mRNA and single-guide RNA achieves liver-specific in vivo genome editing ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Novel Strategy to Combat Antibiotic Resistance: A Sight into the Combination of CRISPR/Cas9 and Nanoparticles.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- The Advance of CRISPR-Cas9-Based and NIR/CRISPR-Cas9-Based Imaging System.Frontiers in chemistry · 2021Review
- CRISPR-Cas12a delivery by DNA-mediated bioresponsive editing for cholesterol regulation.Science advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-editing technologies hold tremendous potential for treating genetic diseases. However, the efficient and safe delivery of genome-editing elements to the location of interest, and the achievement of specific targeted gene correction without off-target side effect remains a big challenge. In this Perspective, we highlight recent developments and discuss the challenges of nonviral nanoparticles for the delivery of genome-editing tools. Finally, we will propose promising strategies to improve the delivery efficacy and advance the clinical translation of gene-editing technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.