Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31342734›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2019

Bloodstream infections in pediatric hematology/oncology patients: Six years’ experience of a single center in Turkey

Tuğçe Tural Kara, Tuğba Erat, Aysun Yahşi, Halil Özdemir, Talia İleri, Elif İnce, Nurdan Taçyıldız, Emel Ünal, Ergin Çiftçi, Erdal İnce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical Analysis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tuğçe Tural KaraDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-0716-7607
Tuğba EratDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0003-2434-4134
Aysun YahşiDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-7245-2028
Halil ÖzdemirDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-7318-1688
Talia İleriDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-0244-353X
Elif İnceDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-6846-6048
Nurdan TaçyıldızDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-5573-4659
Emel ÜnalDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0001-5847-4733
Ergin ÇiftçiDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-4955-160X
Erdal İnceDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyORCID 0000-0002-3476-4610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: Bloodstream infections are the major cause of morbidity, increased cost, prolonged hospitalization, and mortality in pediatric patients. Identifying the predominant microorganisms and antimicrobial susceptibilities in centers helps to select effective empirical antimicrobials which leads to positive clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify the causative microorganisms and their antimicrobial susceptibilities in patients with bloodstream infections. Materials and methods: Data belonging to patients with hematological and/or oncological diseases admitted to our hospital with fever between January 2010 and November 2015 were analyzed. Results: In total, 71 patients who had 111 bloodstream infection episodes were included. Responsible pathogens were detected as follows: 35.1% gram-positive microorganisms, 60.5% gram-negative bacteria, and 4.4% fungi. The most common causative gram-negative pathogen was Escherichia coli and the most commonly isolated gram-positive microorganism was coagulase-negative staphylococci. Conclusion: Gram-negative microorganisms were predominant pathogens in bloodstream infections. Escherichia coli and coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most commonly isolated responsible pathogens. Beta-lactam/lactamase inhibitors were suitable for empirical treatment. However, in critical cases, colistin could have been used for empirical treatment until the culture results were available. Routine glycopeptide use was not required. By identifying the causative microorganisms and their antimicrobial resistance patterns, it will be possible to obtain positive clinical results.

Indexed as

BacteremiaAdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHematologic DiseasesHumansInfantMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesTurkeyYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBloodstream infectionshematology and oncologymicroorganisms

Identifiers

PMID31342734
PMCPMC7018311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.