Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31342465›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2019

Efficacy and adverse effects of oral propranolol in infantile hemangioma: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Hao Yang, Dong-Lai Hu, Qiang Shu, Xiao-Dong Guo

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Propranolol in the Treatment of Infantile Hemangiomas.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hao YangDepartment of Pediatrics Surgery, Jinhua Central Hospital, No. 365 Renmindong Road, Wucheng District, Jinhua, 321000, China.
Dong-Lai HuDepartment of Pediatrics Surgery, Jinhua Central Hospital, No. 365 Renmindong Road, Wucheng District, Jinhua, 321000, China.
Qiang ShuChildren's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 3333 Binsheng Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou, 310052, China.
Xiao-Dong GuoDepartment of Pediatrics Surgery, Jinhua Central Hospital, No. 365 Renmindong Road, Wucheng District, Jinhua, 321000, China. guoxiaodong@zju.edu.cn.
Jinhua Central Hospital · CNChildren's Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of clinical trials evaluated the efficacy and adverse effects of oral propranolol in the treatment of infantile hemangioma (IH), but the treatment has not yet been standardized. This meta-analysis aims to reevaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of oral propranolol in comparative studies and to provide a reliable basis for clinical administration in the therapy for IH.

methodsData were obtained from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang database, from inception to December 1st, 2018. The pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated and used to evaluate the effect size. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model due to heterogeneity between the studies. The Cochrane Collaboration 6 aspects of bias, methodological index for non-randomized studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the risk for bias. Sensitivity analysis, publication bias and subgroup analysis were performed.

resultsEighteen unique studies involving 2701 unique children were included in the analysis. The response rate was reported in 18 trials, which compared oral propranolol with other treatments. The heterogeneity was statistically significant (P < 0.00001, I

conclusionsThis meta-analysis reveals that oral propranolol is superior to other treatments in improving response rate of IH and can be used as the first-line therapy for IH children. A dosage of 2 mg/kg/day propranolol orally may be a good choice for IH. However, further studies are essential.

Indexed as

Administration, OralChildHemangioma, CapillaryHumansPropranololTreatment OutcomePropranololHemangiomaMeta-analysisPropranolol

Identifiers

PMID31342465
OpenAlexW2963026353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.