Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31342411›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2019

Global Change: a Public Health Researcher's Ethical Responsibility.

Mathilde Pascal, Pascal Beaudeau, Sylvia Medina, Nikita Charles Hamilton

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mathilde PascalSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France. Mathilde.PASCAL@santepubliquefrance.fr.
Pascal BeaudeauSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Sylvia MedinaSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Nikita Charles HamiltonThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Santé Publique France · FRÉcole des Hautes Études en Santé Publique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewLoss of biodiversity and globalized environmental degradation result in planetary-scale changes which impact human societies. RECENT

findingsThis paper highlights the urgency for public health researchers to integrate a global change perspective into their daily work. The public health community needs to answer several questions, e.g., how to weight the health of present and future generations; how to balance between the possible immediate adverse impacts of mitigating climate change vs long-term adverse impacts of global change; how to limit the environmental impacts of public health intervention; and how to allocate resources. Public health practitioners are faced with a moral responsibility to address these challenges. Key elements to ensure long-lasting, innovative global change and health solutions include (i) empowering the population; (ii) tailoring the framing of global change and health impacts for different stakeholders; (iii) adopting less conservative approaches on reporting future scenarios; (iv) increasing accountability about the health impacts of mitigation and adaptation strategies; and (v) recognizing the limits of science.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmentHumansMoralsPublic HealthPublic Health PracticeBiodiversityClimate changeEthicsGlobal changePlanetary healthPublic health

Identifiers

PMID31342411
OpenAlexW2963189220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.