Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31342318›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Predicting disease progression in high-grade glioma with neuropsychological parameters: the value of personalized longitudinal assessment.

Elke Butterbrod, Jimme Bruijn, Meriam M Braaksma, Geert-Jan M Rutten, Cees C Tijssen, Monique C J Hanse, Margriet M Sitskoorn, Karin Gehring

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Factors affecting cognitive functions of patients with high-grade gliomas: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elke ButterbrodDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands. E.Butterbrod@tilburguniversity.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7181-1455
Jimme BruijnDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Meriam M BraaksmaDepartment of Neurology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Geert-Jan M RuttenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Cees C TijssenDepartment of Neurology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Monique C J HanseDepartment of Neurology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Margriet M SitskoornDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Karin GehringDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Tilburg University · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

CZ Group 201500028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProgressive disease in patients with high-grade glioma may be reflected in cognitive decline. However, the cognitive functions most sensitive to progression may differ between patients. We investigated whether decline on a personalized selection of tests predicted progressive disease according to RANO criteria in high-grade glioma patients.

methodsStarting one day before surgery, patients underwent neuropsychological assessment every three months during standard treatment and clinical follow-up. We first made a personalized selection of three tests that showed the highest Reliable Change Index (RCI) values, i.e., most positive change, at the first post-surgical assessment for each patient. In subsequent follow up, a decline of RCI ≤ - 1 on at least two of the three tests in the selection was considered cognitive decline. We performed a discrete Cox proportional hazards model including a time-dependent coefficient cognitive decline (vs. stability) and covariate age to predict progressive disease.

resultsTwenty five patients were included. Cognitive decline on the personalized test selection preceded or had occurred by the time progression was established in 9/15 patients with RANO confirmed progressive disease (60%). Decline was absent in 8/10 patients (80%) with stable disease during participation. The independent hazard ratio for progression in case of cognitive decline was 5.05 (p < 0.01) compared to stable performance.

conclusionsUsing only three patient-specific neuropsychological tests, we found a fivefold increased chance of disease progression in case of cognitive decline as compared to stable performance. Brief, patient-tailored cognitive assessment may be a noninvasive addition to disease monitoring without overburdening patients and clinical care.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsCognition DisordersDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGliomaHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsNeurosurgical ProceduresPredictive Value of TestsCognitive functioningDisease progressionHigh-grade gliomaNeuropsychological assessmentRANO

Identifiers

PMID31342318
PMCPMC6764928
OpenAlexW2963061118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.