Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31342283›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Twenty-first Century Bedside Manner: Exploring Patient-Centered Communication in Secure Messaging with Cancer Patients.

Jordan M Alpert, Merry Jennifer Markham, Ragnhildur I Bjarnadottir, Carma L Bylund

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluating the SEND eHealth Application to Improve Patients' Secure Message Writing.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Integrating patient-centeredness into online patient-clinician communication: a qualitative analysis of clinicians' secure messaging usage.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  11. Secure Messaging and COVID-19: A Content Analysis of Patient-Clinician Communication During the Pandemic.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jordan M AlpertDepartment of Advertising, University of Florida, 2093 Weimer Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. Jordan.Alpert@ufl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7066-4748
Merry Jennifer MarkhamDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Ragnhildur I BjarnadottirCollege of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Carma L BylundCollege of Journalism and Communications / College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-centered communication (PCC) is integral to providing high-quality health care and is recommended to be incorporated during face-to-face consultations. Electronic communication, such as the use of secure messaging (SM) within patient portals, is a popular form of patient-provider communication, but preliminary studies have shown that PCC is rarely utilized by providers in SM. As a consequence, the patient-provider relationship can be negatively affected, especially for cancer patients who have greater electronic health information needs than the general population. Therefore, our objective was to determine the importance of SM to cancer patients and to identify which attributes of PCC are preferred to be incorporated into secure messages. Five focus groups were conducted, comprised of patients with a current or previous cancer diagnosis (three all-female; two all-male). Participants recalled their own experiences and reviewed simulated messages. Three main topics emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) the normalization of SM, (2) SM quality can affect perceptions of care, and (3) patients need guidance. Overall, participants valued the ability to communicate with their care team using SM and indicated that electronic communication may have the potential to have just as big of an impact on a patient's care than in-person communication.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient PortalsCommunicationFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePatient-Centered CareFocus groupsHealth communicationPatient portalQualitative researchSecure messaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.