Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31342218›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2019

The Charles Bonnet Syndrome: a Systematic Review of Diagnostic Criteria.

Ali G Hamedani, Victoria S Pelak

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. What does a migraine aura look like?-A systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Charles Bonnet syndrome in patients referred for cataract surgery.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comorbidities in Friedreich ataxia: incidence and manifestations from early to advanced disease stages.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. A Case Report on Charles Bonnet Syndrome.Iranian journal of psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Medicare Claims Data Underestimate Hallucinations in Older Adults With Dementia.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ali G HamedaniDepartment of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., 3 W. Gates Bldg., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Ali.hamedani@uphs.upenn.edu.
Victoria S PelakDepartments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, The Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo perform a systematic review of diagnostic criteria for the Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS). RECENT

findingsAcross 33 studies that specified diagnostic criteria for CBS, hallucinations and vision loss were a common requirement, but there was considerable heterogeneity regarding hallucination properties (i.e., formed vs. unformed) and the severity of vision loss. The exclusion of confounding neuropsychiatric disorders was also common, but specific disorders and their method of ascertainment were variable. There is considerable diagnostic heterogeneity for CBS in the literature. These differences have important implications for the results of observational and interventional studies of CBS and highlight the need for unified diagnostic criteria.

Indexed as

Charles Bonnet syndromeDiagnostic criteriaRelease hallucinationsSystematic reviewVision lossVisual hallucinations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.