ArticleLasers in medical science2020
Swept-source optical coherence tomographic observation on prevalence and variations of cemento-enamel junction morphology.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing cementoenamel junction (CEJ) imaging using gold nanorods in optical coherence tomography (OCT).Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Clinical and primary evidence of silver diamine fluoride on root caries management.The Japanese dental science review · 2022Review
- Treatment efficacy of gingival recession defects associated with non-carious cervical lesions: a systematic review.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2022Article
- Automatic Detection of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Based on Deep Learning and Local Outlier Factor Algorithm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the prevalence of different patterns of cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) morphology under swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). One hundred extracted human teeth were used consisting of incisors, premolars, and molars. Each sample was observed for every 500 μm circumferentially along CEJ and OCT images of the pattern were noted. Microscopic observations were done for the representative sample using confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The OCT images exhibited four CEJ patterns: edge-to-edge (type I), exposed dentin (type II), cementum overlapping enamel (type III), and enamel overlapping cementum (type IV). The prevalence of CEJ patterns was further statistically considered for mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual surfaces. The real-time imaging by SS-OCT instantly determined CEJ morphology. CLSM and TEM observation revealed morphological features along CEJ, which corresponded to OCT images of CEJ anatomy. OCT results showed 56.8% of type I pattern predominantly found on proximal surfaces, followed by 36.5% of type II pattern on buccal and lingual surface, 6.4% of type III pattern, and 0.3% of type IV pattern. There was a significant difference in prevalence of CEJ patterns among different types of teeth, but there was no statistically significant difference among the four surfaces in each type of teeth. OCT is a non-invasive diagnostic tool to examine the CEJ patterns along the entire circumference. OCT observation revealed even minor dentin exposure that would need clinical and home procedures to prevent any symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.