Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31342129›Full record

ArticlePediatric radiology2019

Diagnostic performance of standardized ultrasound protocol for detecting perforation in pediatric appendicitis.

Erica L Riedesel, Blake C Weber, Matthew W Shore, Randi S Cartmill, Daniel J Ostlie, Charles M Leys, Kara G Gill, Jonathan E Kohler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erica L RiedeselDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta and Emory University, 1405 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. erica.riedesel@choa.org.
Blake C WeberDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Matthew W ShoreDivision of Pediatric Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Randi S CartmillDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3617-2640
Daniel J OstlieDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Phoenix Children's Hospital and University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Charles M LeysDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Kara G GillDivision of Pediatric Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Jonathan E KohlerDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USEmory University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent clinical trials in adults and children have shown that uncomplicated acute appendicitis can be successfully treated with antibiotics alone. As treatment strategies for acute appendicitis diverge, accurate preoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis and appendiceal perforation has become increasingly important for clinical decision-making.

objectiveTo examine diagnostic performance of ultrasound for detecting perforated appendicitis in a single institution using a standardized technique. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective single-center study we evaluated 113 ultrasounds from pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy between November 2014 and December 2015. All ultrasounds were performed using a standardized US protocol including still and cine images of all four abdominal quadrants, with more targeted evaluation of the right lower quadrant (RLQ) using graded compression technique. We compared US findings to intraoperative diagnosis of non-perforated or perforated acute appendicitis.

resultsThe standardized image protocol generated a reproducible set of ultrasound images in all cases. The most common primary appendiceal finding on US in perforated appendicitis was appendix wall thickening >3 mm (54%, 171/314) and most common secondary finding was echogenic mesenteric fat (75%, 237/314). Thinning of the appendix wall and loculated fluid collection in the right lower quadrant were both highly specific (>90%) for perforation.

conclusionThe diagnostic performance of ultrasound using a standardized US technique was similar to that reported in prior studies for detecting perforated appendicitis. Despite low sensitivity, individual ultrasound findings and overall diagnostic impression of "evidence of appendix perforation" remain highly specific.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdolescentAppendectomyAppendicitisChildChild, PreschoolEmergenciesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitals, PediatricHumansIntestinal PerforationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleObserver VariationRegistriesAppendicitisAppendixChildrenNon-surgical treatmentPerforationUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID31342129
OpenAlexW2963410593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.