ArticleJournal of animal science2019
Tissue residue depletion and estimation of extralabel meat withdrawal intervals for tulathromycin in calves after pneumatic dart administration.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of aComparative medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the injection site pathology and determine tissue residue depletion of tulathromycin in calves following pneumatic dart administration and to calculate the associated extralabel withdrawal interval (WDI). Castrated male Holstein calves were injected with ~2.6 mg/kg tulathromycin via pneumatic dart administration. At 1 (n = 2), 6, 12, 18, and 24 d after drug injection (n = 3/time point), calves were euthanized, and muscle, liver, kidney, fat, and injection site samples were harvested and analyzed for tulathromycin concentrations using a LC-MS/MS method. Gross pathology and histopathology evaluations on the injection site samples were also performed. Pneumatic dart administration of tulathromycin caused severe localized lesions of hemorrhage and edema on days 1 and 6, as well as severe pathological reactions in the subcutaneous muscle on days 1, 6, and 12. Slight to moderate reactions were still observed in the majority of the skin or subcutaneous/muscle samples on day 24. Measured tulathromycin concentrations were converted to calculate the concentrations of the marker residue CP-60,300 by dividing a conversion factor of 1.4. The data were used to calculate extralabel WDIs based on the guidelines from U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The results showed that tulathromycin concentrations were the highest in the liver (4,877.84 ± 65.33 µg/kg), kidney (5,819.52 ± 1,087.00 µg/kg), muscle (1,717.04 ± 140.35 µg/kg), injection site (51,884.05 ± 7,529.34 µg/kg), and fat (161.69 ± 36.48 µg/kg) at 6, 1, 1, 1, and 1 d, respectively, after treatment. Tulathromycin concentrations remained above the limit of quantification of 5 µg/kg in all tissues at 24 d. The calculated WDIs based on kidney data were 26 d using EMA method, 36 d using FDA method based on CP-60,300 data, and 45 d using FDA method based on tulathromycin data. These results suggest that pneumatic dart administration of tulathromycin causes injection site reactions in calves and an extended WDI is needed. One limitation of this study was the small sample size of 3 that did not meet FDA guideline requirement. Therefore, the calculated WDIs should be considered as preliminary and additional studies that use a larger number of animals and directly measure the concentrations of the marker residue CP-60,300 are needed to make a more conclusive recommendation on the extralabel WDI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.