Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31341976›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2019

Adaptive radiotherapy: The Elekta Unity MR-linac concept.

Dennis Winkel, Gijsbert H Bol, Petra S Kroon, Bram van Asselen, Sara S Hackett, Anita M Werensteijn-Honingh, Martijn P W Intven, Wietse S C Eppinga, Rob H N Tijssen, Linda G W Kerkmeijer and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06244537 (Study on the Safety and Efficacy of MR-Linac Technique in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced Colon Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 338 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
338citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06244537 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Study on the Safety and Efficacy of MR-Linac Technique in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced Colon Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSichuan Cancer Hospital and Research InstituteRan2024 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsSafety and EfficacyArmsMR-linac
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

338 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Joint EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Real-time motion tracking of a gold implant in water by Cherenkov lights.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

278 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Dennis WinkelDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gijsbert H BolDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Petra S KroonDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bram van AsselenDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sara S HackettDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anita M Werensteijn-HoninghDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martijn P W IntvenDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wietse S C EppingaDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rob H N TijssenDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Linda G W KerkmeijerDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hans C J de BoerDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stella MookDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gert J MeijerDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jochem HesDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mirjam Willemsen-BosmanDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eline N de Groot-van BreugelDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ina M Jürgenliemk-SchulzDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bas W RaaymakersDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe promise of the MR-linac is that one can visualize all anatomical changes during the course of radiotherapy and hence adapt the treatment plan in order to always have the optimal treatment. Yet, there is a trade-off to be made between the time spent for adapting the treatment plan against the dosimetric gain. In this work, the various daily plan adaptation methods will be presented and applied on a variety of tumour sites. The aim is to provide an insight in the behavior of the state-of-the-art 1.5 T MRI guided on-line adaptive radiotherapy methods. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo explore the different available plan adaptation workflows and methods, we have simulated online plan adaptation for five cases with varying levels of inter-fraction motion, regions of interest and target sizes: prostate, rectum, esophagus and lymph node oligometastases (single and multiple target). The plans were evaluated based on the clinical dose constraints and the optimization time was measured.

resultsThe time needed for plan adaptation ranged between 17 and 485 s. More advanced plan adaptation methods generally resulted in more plans that met the clinical dose criteria. Violations were often caused by insufficient PTV coverage or, for the multiple lymph node case, a too high dose to OAR in the vicinity of the PTV. With full online replanning it was possible to create plans that met all clinical dose constraints for all cases.

conclusionDaily full online replanning is the most robust adaptive planning method for Unity. It is feasible for specific sites in clinically acceptable times. Faster methods are available, but before applying these, the specific use cases should be explored dosimetrically.

Indexed as

Adaptive radiotherapyMRI-guided radiotherapyMR-linacOnline plan adaptationRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31341976
PMCPMC6630157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.