Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31341974›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2019

Estimating survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancers and brain metastases: An update of the graded prognostic assessment for gastrointestinal cancers (GI-GPA).

Paul W Sperduto, Penny Fang, Jing Li, William Breen, Paul D Brown, Daniel Cagney, Ayal Aizer, James B Yu, Veronica Chiang, Supriya Jain and 26 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Radionecrosis risk and local control after CyberKnifeRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Brain metastases from hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Recent Update on Neurosurgical Management of Brain Metastasis.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Paul W SperdutoMinneapolis Radiation Oncology and University of Minnesota Gamma Knife Center, USA.
Penny FangMD Anderson Cancer Center, USA.
Jing LiMD Anderson Cancer Center, USA.
William BreenMayo Clinic, USA.
Paul D BrownMayo Clinic, USA.
Daniel CagneyDana Farber Cancer Institute, USA.
Ayal AizerDana Farber Cancer Institute, USA.
James B YuYale, USA.
Veronica ChiangYale, USA.
Supriya JainUniversity of Colorado, USA.
Laurie E GasparUniversity of Colorado, USA.
Sten MyrehaugSunnybrook, USA.
Arjun SahgalSunnybrook, USA.
Steve BraunsteinUniversity of California San Francisco, USA.
Penny SneedUniversity of California San Francisco, USA.
Brent CameronVanderbilt University Medical Center, USA.
Albert AttiaVanderbilt University Medical Center, USA.
Jason MolitorisUniversity of Maryland, USA.
Cheng-Chia WuColumbia University Medical Center, USA.
Tony J C WangColumbia University Medical Center, USA.
Natalie A LockneyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, USA.
Kathryn BealMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, USA.
Jessica ParkhurstUniversity of Iowa, USA.
John M BuattiUniversity of Iowa, USA.
Ryan ShanleyUniversity of Minnesota, USA.
Emil LouUniversity of Minnesota, USA.
Daniel D TandbergDuke University, USA.
John P KirkpatrickDuke University, USA.
Diana ShiMassachusetts General Hospital, USA.
Helen A ShihMassachusetts General Hospital, USA.
Michael ChuongMiami Cancer Institute, USA.
Hirotake SaitoNiigata University, Japan.
Hidefumi AoyamaNiigata University, Japan.
Laura MasucciCentre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montreal, Canada.
David RobergeCentre Hospitalier de l' Université de Montreal, Canada.
Minesh P MehtaMiami Cancer Institute, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with gastrointestinal cancers and brain metastases (BM) represent a unique and heterogeneous population. Our group previously published the Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) for patients with GI cancers (GI-GPA) (1985-2007, n = 209). The purpose of this study is to update the GI-GPA based on a larger contemporary database.

methodsAn IRB-approved consortium database analysis was performed using a multi-institutional (18), multi-national (3) cohort of 792 patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, with newly-diagnosed BM diagnosed between 1/1/2006 and 12/31/2017. Survival was measured from date of first treatment for BM. Multiple Cox regression was used to select and weight prognostic factors in proportion to their hazard ratios. These factors were incorporated into the updated GI-GPA.

resultsMedian survival (MS) varied widely by primary site and other prognostic factors. Four significant factors (KPS, age, extracranial metastases and number of BM) were used to formulate the updated GI-GPA. Overall MS for this cohort remains poor; 8 months. MS by GPA was 3, 7, 11 and 17 months for GPA 0-1, 1.5-2, 2.5-3.0 and 3.5-4.0, respectively. >30% present in the worst prognostic group (GI-GPA of ≤1.0).

conclusionsBrain metastases are not uncommon in GI cancer patients and MS varies widely among them. This updated GI-GPA index improves our ability to estimate survival for these patients and will be useful for therapy selection, end-of-life decision-making and stratification for future clinical trials. A user-friendly, free, on-line app to calculate the GPA score and estimate survival for an individual patient is available at brainmetgpa.com.

Indexed as

Brain metastasesEnd-of-lifeGastrointestinal cancersPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID31341974
PMCPMC6612649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.