Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31341723›Full record

ArticleJournal of liver2019

Liver Fibrosis Conventional and Molecular Imaging Diagnosis Update.

Shujing Li, Xicui Sun, Minjie Chen, Zhekang Ying, Yamin Wan, Liya Pi, Bin Ren, Qi Cao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of liver, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pharmacotherapy of Liver Fibrosis and Hepatitis: Recent Advances.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Radiology of fibrosis part II: abdominal organs.Journal of translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shujing LiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Xicui SunDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Minjie ChenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Zhekang YingDepartment of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Yamin WanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Liya PiDepartment of Pediatrics in the College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Bin RenDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Alabama, USA.
Qi CaoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USFirst Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Epigenetic and Transcriptional Regulation of Angiogenic Regulator CD36 and Transformation of Capillaries into Small ArteriesR01HL136423 · NHLBI · VERSITI WISCONSIN, INC. · PI REN, BIN · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
18F Proline Preclinical PET Imaging In The Diagnosis of Early Stage Alcoholic Liver FibrosisK08AA024895 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CAO, QI · 2017 to 2021
$953k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL136423NIAAA NIH HHS K08 AA024895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is a serious, life-threatening disease with high morbidity and mortality that result from diverse causes. Liver biopsy, considered the "gold standard" to diagnose, grade, and stage liver fibrosis, has limitations in terms of invasiveness, cost, sampling variability, inter-observer variability, and the dynamic process of fibrosis. Compelling evidence has demonstrated that all stages of fibrosis are reversible if the injury is removed. There is a clear need for safe, effective, and reliable non-invasive assessment modalities to determine liver fibrosis in order to manage it precisely in personalized medicine. However, conventional imaging methods used to assess morphological and structural changes related to liver fibrosis, including ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are only useful in assessing advanced liver disease, including cirrhosis. Functional imaging techniques, including MR elastography (MRE), US elastography, and CT perfusion are useful for assessing moderate to advanced liver fibrosis. MRE is considered the most accurate noninvasive imaging technique, and US elastography is currently the most widely used noninvasive means. However, these modalities are less accurate in early-stage liver fibrosis and some factors affect the accuracy of these techniques. Molecular imaging is a target-specific imaging mechanism that has the potential to accurately diagnose early-stage liver fibrosis. We provide an overview of recent advances in molecular imaging for the diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis which will enable clinicians to monitor the progression of disease and potentially reverse liver fibrosis. We compare the promising technologies with conventional and functional imaging and assess the utility of molecular imaging in precision and personalized clinical medicine in the early stages of liver fibrosis.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyLiver fibrosisMagnetic resonance imagingNuclear medicineUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID31341723
PMCPMC6653681
OpenAlexW2955572789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.