ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2019
Multiple sclerosis and sarcoidosis: A case for coexistence.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A framework for exclusion of alternative diagnoses in sarcoidosis.Journal of autoimmunity · 2024Review
- Cerebral lesions sites in neurosarcoidosis: a lesion mapping study.Journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Differentiating neurosarcoidosis from multiple sclerosis using combined analysis of basic CSF parameters and MRZ reaction.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- How to make a decision on the choice of therapy for multiple sclerosis with sarcoidosis comorbidity?Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2022Article
- Multiple sclerosis in sarcoidosis patients: Two case reports.Clinical case reports · 2022Article
- The "central vein sign" in patients with diagnostic "red flags" for multiple sclerosis: A prospective multicenter 3T study.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2020Article
- Vitamin D supplementation for the prevention or depletion of side effects of therapy with alemtuzumab in multiple sclerosis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with biopsy-proven systemic sarcoidosis who develop a chronic CNS disorder are often presumed to have neurosarcoidosis (NS), however, the possibility of comorbid neurologic disease, such as MS, must be considered if presentation and course are not typical for NS.
methodsRetrospective chart review across 4 academic MS centers was undertaken to identify patients with diagnosis of MS (2017 McDonald criteria) and biopsy-confirmed extraneural sarcoidosis. Data were abstracted from each chart using a case report form that systematically queried for demographic, clinical, and paraclinical characteristics relevant to NS and MS.
resultsTen patients met our inclusion criteria (mean age 47.7 [±5.9] years; 80% female). Noncaseating granulomas consistent with sarcoidosis were found on biopsy in all cases (lung 7/10, mediastinum 2/10, liver 1/10, spleen 1/10, and skin 1/10). Diagnosis of MS was based on clinical history of MS-like relapses and MRI findings characteristic of demyelination and typical disease evolution during follow-up (average of 7 years). No patient developed features of NS that could be considered a "red flag" against the diagnosis of MS (such as meningeal enhancement, hydrocephalus, and pituitary involvement). All patients were treated with disease-modifying therapy for MS.
conclusionsWe propose a rational diagnostic approach to patients with sarcoidosis who may have comorbid MS. When the clinical picture is equivocal, the presence of multiple "MS-typical lesions" and the absence of any "NS-typical lesions" on MRI favor diagnosis of MS. Close follow-up is required to ascertain whether clinical and radiologic disease evolution and response to MS therapies conform to the proposed diagnosis of MS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.