ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2019
Differences in treatment of epilepsy in pregnancy: A worldwide survey.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Folic Acid and Risk of Preterm Birth, Preeclampsia, and Fetal Growth Restriction Among Women With Epilepsy: A Prospective Cohort Study.Neurology · 2022Article
- THE IMPACT OF ANTIEPILEPTIC TREATMENT IN PREGNANCY ON PERINATAL OUTCOME IN CROATIA - A SINGLE-CENTER STUDY.Acta clinica Croatica · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHow to safely treat pregnant women with epilepsy is a question for which there are guidelines, but variations in practice exist.
methodsTo better characterize how clinicians address this difficult clinical question, we distributed an anonymous survey to neurology practitioners across subspecialties and different levels of training via the
resultsThe results of this survey demonstrate a wide range in the amount of folic acid recommended and the frequency of checking levels of anti-epileptic drugs. Choice of first-line agent varied by the economic development status of the respondent's country, suggesting that access to medications plays an important role in clinical decision making in many parts of the world.
conclusionThis survey highlights several areas where further research would be helpful in guiding practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.