ArticleIranian journal of microbiology2019
Identification of
Article in Iranian journal of microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in infections as risk factors for lymphoma: a review of the effects of viral, bacterial, and fungal infections in lymphoma.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Exploring oral candidiasis among cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in eastern Iran.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Co-colonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Candida spp. in children with malignancies.AMB Express · 2024Article
- Antifungal Effect of ProbioticJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2023Article
- Effect of nystatin and licorice on yeasts isolated from the oral lesions of patients with cancer under chemotherapy (Dental research journal · 2022Article
- Article
- Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 11: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2019.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
- An Overview of the Management of the Most Important Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with Blood Malignancies.Infection and drug resistance · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesOral candidiasis is a serious problem for immunocompromised patients, especially patients with hematological malignancies. After becoming a systemic candidiasis it is difficult to diagnose, control and treat in individuals with hematological malignancies. The aim of this study was to diagnose candidiasis in the oral mucosa of patients with leukemias and lymphomas in a timely manner in order to prevent their progression to systemic candidiasis. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this cross sectional study, 50 clinical samples were collected from the mouth of patients with hematological malignancies undergoing chemotherapy from the oncology units of teaching hospitals in Kerman, Iran. Patients were from Kerman, Sistan-Baluchestan and Hormozgan in south-eastern Iran. Sampling was restricted to patients with diagnosed acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL); acute myeloid leukemia (AML); chronic lymphoid leukemia (CLL); chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Presumptive species identification of fungi was performed using conventional methods like colony characteristics on CHROMagar
resultsFrom a total of 50, 14 patients (28%) had positive oral candidiasis.
conclusionThe results indicate that oral candidiasis is a prevalent fungal infection in the patients with hematologic malignancies with
Indexed as
Identifiers
31341565PMC6635309W2947246014What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.