Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31341495›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2019

Acupuncture for Chronic Pain-Related Insomnia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fushui Liu, Jianyu You, Qi Li, Ting Fang, Mei Chen, Nana Tang, Xiaojun Yan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Efficacy and safety ofContemporary clinical trials communications · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Moxibustion for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fushui LiuCollege of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8304-0889
Jianyu YouCollege of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.
Qi LiJiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China.
Ting FangCollege of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3639-987X
Mei ChenCollege of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0050-6955
Nana TangThe Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5708-6955
Xiaojun YanResearch Center for Differentiation and Development of TCM Basic Theory, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2485-6930
Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNAffiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNJiangxi Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID31341495
PMCPMC6612974
OpenAlexW2955114240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.