Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31341358›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2019

Current status of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy.

Chonlada Krutsri, Mitsuhiro Kida, Hiroshi Yamauchi, Tomohisa Iwai, Hiroshi Imaizumi, Wasaburo Koizumi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chonlada KrutsriDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Mitsuhiro KidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kitasato University Hospital, Kanagawa 252-0375, Japan. m-kida@kitasato-u.ac.jp.
Hiroshi YamauchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kitasato University Hospital, Kanagawa 252-0375, Japan.
Tomohisa IwaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kitasato University Hospital, Kanagawa 252-0375, Japan.
Hiroshi ImaizumiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kitasato University Hospital, Kanagawa 252-0375, Japan.
Wasaburo KoizumiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kitasato University Hospital, Kanagawa 252-0375, Japan.
Ramathibodi Hospital · THKitasato University Hospital · JPMahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with surgically altered anatomy must be performed by a highly experienced endoscopist. The challenges are accessing the afferent limb in different types of reconstruction, cannulating a papilla with a reverse orientation, and performing therapeutic interventions with uncommon endoscopic accessories. The development of endoscopic techniques has led to higher success rates in this group of patients. Device-assisted ERCP is the endoscopic procedure of choice for high success rates in short-limb reconstruction; however, these success rate is lower in long-limb reconstruction. ERCP assisted by endoscopic ultrasonography is now popular because it can be performed independent of the limb length; however, it must be performed by a highly experienced and skilled endoscopist. Stent deployment and small stone removal can be performed immediately after ERCP assisted by endoscopic ultrasonography, but the second session is needed for other difficult procedures such as cholangioscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Laparoscopic-assisted ERCP has an almost 100% success rate in long-limb reconstruction because of the use of a conventional side-view duodenoscope, which is compatible with standard accessories. This requires cooperation between the surgeon and endoscopist and is suitable in urgent situations requiring concomitant cholecystectomy. This review focuses on the advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes of various procedures that are suitable in different situations and reconstruction types. Emerging new techniques and their outcomes are also discussed.

Indexed as

Biliary TractCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholecystectomyDuodenoscopesEndosonographyGastrectomyGastric BypassHumansLaparoscopyPancreaticoduodenectomyPlastic Surgery ProceduresStentsTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, Interventional: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in Billroth IIEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography post-WhippleEndoscopic ultrasonography-guided endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographySurgically altered anatomy

Identifiers

PMID31341358
PMCPMC6639547
OpenAlexW2958163368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.