Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31341333›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of ecology2019

Relationships between plant traits, soil properties and carbon fluxes differ between monocultures and mixed communities in temperate grassland.

Jonathan R De Long, Benjamin G Jackson, Anna Wilkinson, William J Pritchard, Simon Oakley, Kelly E Mason, Jörg G Stephan, Nicholas J Ostle, David Johnson, Elizabeth M Baggs and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of ecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of nitrogen addition andFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jonathan R De LongSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-4818
Benjamin G JacksonThe Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies University of Edinburgh Midlothian UK.
Anna WilkinsonSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester UK.
William J PritchardSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester UK.
Simon OakleyCentre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre Bailrigg UK.
Kelly E MasonCentre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre Bailrigg UK.
Jörg G StephanDepartment of Ecology Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6195-7867
Nicholas J OstleLancaster Environment Centre Lancaster University Lancaster UK.
David JohnsonSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester UK.
Elizabeth M BaggsThe Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies University of Edinburgh Midlothian UK.
Richard D BardgettSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Manchester Manchester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5131-0127

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of plant traits to predict ecosystem functions has been gaining growing attention. Above-ground plant traits, such as leaf nitrogen (N) content and specific leaf area (SLA), have been shown to strongly relate to ecosystem productivity, respiration and nutrient cycling. Furthermore, increasing plant functional trait diversity has been suggested as a possible mechanism to increase ecosystem carbon (C) storage. However, it is uncertain whether below-ground plant traits can be predicted by above-ground traits, and if both above- and below-ground traits can be used to predict soil properties and ecosystem-level functions.Here, we used two adjacent field experiments in temperate grassland to investigate if above- and below-ground plant traits are related, and whether relationships between plant traits, soil properties and ecosystem C fluxes (i.e. ecosystem respiration and net ecosystem exchange) measured in potted monocultures could be detected in mixed field communities.We found that certain shoot traits (e.g. shoot N and C, and leaf dry matter content) were related to root traits (e.g. root N, root C:N and root dry matter content) in monocultures, but such relationships were either weak or not detected in mixed communities. Some relationships between plant traits (i.e. shoot N, root N and/or shoot C:N) and soil properties (i.e. inorganic N availability and microbial community structure) were similar in monocultures and mixed communities, but they were more strongly linked to shoot traits in monocultures and root traits in mixed communities. Structural equation modelling showed that above- and below-ground traits and soil properties improved predictions of ecosystem C fluxes in monocultures, but not in mixed communities on the basis of community-weighted mean traits.

Indexed as

above‐ground–below‐ground linkagesbiodiversitycarbonecosystem functionnet ecosystem exchangenitrogenplant functional traitssoil microbial communities

Identifiers

PMID31341333
PMCPMC6617750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.