Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31341205›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Comparative mitogenomics of the Decapoda reveals evolutionary heterogeneity in architecture and composition.

Mun Hua Tan, Han Ming Gan, Yin Peng Lee, Heather Bracken-Grissom, Tin-Yam Chan, Adam D Miller, Christopher M Austin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The mitochondrial genome of the pentastome parasiteMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mun Hua TanCentre of Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. mun.tan@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3396-8213
Han Ming GanCentre of Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Yin Peng LeeCentre of Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Heather Bracken-GrissomDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, North Miami, Florida, 33181, USA.
Tin-Yam ChanInstitute of Marine Biology and Center of Excellence for the Oceans, National Taiwan Ocean University, 2 Pei-Ning Road, Keelung, 20224, Taiwan.
Adam D MillerCentre of Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Christopher M AustinCentre of Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of cost-effective and rapid sequencing approaches has resulted in an exponential rise in the number of mitogenomes on public databases in recent years, providing greater opportunity for undertaking large-scale comparative genomic and systematic research. Nonetheless, current datasets predominately come from small and disconnected studies on a limited number of related species, introducing sampling biases and impeding research of broad taxonomic relevance. This study contributes 21 crustacean mitogenomes from several under-represented decapod infraorders including Polychelida and Stenopodidea, which are used in combination with 225 mitogenomes available on NCBI to investigate decapod mitogenome diversity and phylogeny. An overview of mitochondrial gene orders (MGOs) reveals a high level of genomic variability within the Decapoda, with a large number of MGOs deviating from the ancestral arthropod ground pattern and unevenly distributed among infraorders. Despite the substantial morphological and ecological variation among decapods, there was limited evidence for correlations between gene rearrangement events and species ecology or lineage specific nucleotide substitution rates. Within a phylogenetic context, predicted scenarios of rearrangements show some MGOs to be informative synapomorphies for some taxonomic groups providing strong independent support for phylogenetic relationships. Additional comparisons for a range of mitogenomic features including nucleotide composition, strand asymmetry, unassigned regions and codon usage indicate several clade-specific trends that are of evolutionary and ecological interest.

Indexed as

AnimalsDecapodaEvolution, MolecularGene RearrangementGenomicsMitochondriaPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID31341205
PMCPMC6656734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.