Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31341177›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Differential responses of epithelial cells from urinary and biliary tract to eggs of Schistosoma haematobium and S. mansoni.

Rafael Nacif-Pimenta, Alessandra da Silva Orfanó, Ilana A Mosley, Shannon E Karinshak, Kenji Ishida, Victoria H Mann, Paulo Marcos Zech Coelho, José M Correia da Costa, Michael H Hsieh, Paul J Brindley and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05941884 (Possible Diagnostic Protein Markers in Schistosoma Related Bladder Diseases.), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05941884 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Possible Diagnostic Protein Markers in Schistosoma Related Bladder Diseases.

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2023 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsSchistosoma HaematobiumArmsImmunohistochemistry staining,, microscopic examination of urine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. DoesCells · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Rafael Nacif-PimentaDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology & Tropical Medicine, and Research Center for the Neglected Diseases of Poverty, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
Alessandra da Silva OrfanóLaboratório de Entomologia Médica, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ilana A MosleyDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology & Tropical Medicine, and Research Center for the Neglected Diseases of Poverty, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
Shannon E KarinshakDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology & Tropical Medicine, and Research Center for the Neglected Diseases of Poverty, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
Kenji IshidaBiomedical Research Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Victoria H MannDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology & Tropical Medicine, and Research Center for the Neglected Diseases of Poverty, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
Paulo Marcos Zech CoelhoLaboratório de Esquistossomose, Instituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
José M Correia da CostaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, R&D Unit, INSA-National Health Institute Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Porto, Portugal.
Michael H HsiehBiomedical Research Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9650-2691
Paul J BrindleyDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology & Tropical Medicine, and Research Center for the Neglected Diseases of Poverty, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA. pbrindley@gwu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-0002
Gabriel RinaldiDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology & Tropical Medicine, and Research Center for the Neglected Diseases of Poverty, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA. gr10@sanger.ac.uk.
George Washington University · USFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRBiomedical Research Institute · USChildren's National · USUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

Targeting parasite-host communication to combat liver fluke-induced bile duct cancerR01CA164719 · NCI · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Paul J Brindley, THEWARACH LAHA · 2012 to 2026
$5.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164719NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201000005CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201000005IWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic urogenital schistosomiasis can lead to squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder. The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies the infection with S. haematobium as a group 1 carcinogen, a definitive cause of cancer. By contrast, hepatointestinal schistosomiasis due to the chronic infection with S. mansoni or S. japonicum associated with liver periportal fibrosis, does not apparently lead to malignancy. The effects of culturing human epithelial cells, HCV29, established from normal urothelium, and H69, established from cholangiocytes, in the presence of S. haematobium or S. mansoni eggs were investigated. Cell growth of cells co-cultured with schistosome eggs was monitored in real time, and gene expression analysis of oncogenesis, epithelial to mesenchymal transition and apoptosis pathways was undertaken. Schistosome eggs promoted proliferation of the urothelial cells but inhibited growth of cholangiocytes. In addition, the tumor suppressor P53 pathway was significantly downregulated when exposed to schistosome eggs, and downregulation of estrogen receptor was predicted in urothelial cells exposed only to S. haematobium eggs. Overall, cell proliferative responses were influenced by both the tissue origin of the epithelial cells and the schistosome species.

Indexed as

Schistosoma haematobiumSchistosoma mansoniAnimalsBiliary TractCell LineCoculture TechniquesColorectal NeoplasmsEpitheliumEstradiolHumansOvumReceptors, EstrogenSchistosomiasis haematobiaSchistosomiasis mansoniSignal TransductionTranscriptomeEstradiolReceptors, EstrogenTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID31341177
PMCPMC6656753
OpenAlexW2962869692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.