ArticleJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2020
The Perinatal Condition Around Birth and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the Japanese General Population: The Suita Study.
Article in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations of Infant Feeding with Body Composition and Cardiometabolic Health in Young Female University Students.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2022Article
- Physique at Birth and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Japanese Urban Residents: the KOBE Study.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2022Article
- Relationship between Birth Weight and Future Cardiovascular Risks in Japanese in View of the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHad) Theory.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2022Article
- Future Cardiovascular Risk may Vary by Fetal Presentation at Delivery.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo investigate the relationship between perinatal condition around birth and cardiovascular risk in later life.
methodsRetrospective data were examined from 1241 city dwellers (521 men, 720 women; age 41-69 years) who had undergone medical examination at a single institution including blood tests and physical measurements from 2007 to 2008. The questionnaire was conducted to determine how perinatal factors affect their lives later. We also selected and studied a total of 28 individuals (12 men and 16 women) specifically about the conformity rate of the breastfeeding method between participants' memories and what was written in the maternal and child health handbooks.
resultsThe conformity rate of the breastfeeding method between a self-questionnaire and his/her maternal and child health handbook was well correlated (r=0.73; p<0.025). Among the data in women who were born at home, HbA1C levels (5.36±0.03 vs. 5.25±0.05 mg/dL, p=0.03) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (136.0±1.4 vs. 129.3±2.5 mg/dL, p=0.04) were higher than women who were born at the hospital. Women raised by formula showed higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels than women fed breast milk or a mixture of breast milk and formula (150.2±4.8 vs. 138.7±3.7, 142.5±2.6 mg/dL, p=0.04). Fasting blood glucose levels at an adult time in men and women born through breech presentation were higher than those by the cephalic presentation (123.2±7.8 vs. 106.8±1.2 mg/dL, p=0.03).
conclusionThe study proposed that some perinatal conditions around birth such as delivery place, presenting part, and lactation affected especially Japanese women's cardiovascular risks between ages 41 and 69 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.