Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31341070›Full record

ArticlemSphere2019

Rectal Swabs from Critically Ill Patients Provide Discordant Representations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Stool Samples.

Katherine Fair, Daniel G Dunlap, Adam Fitch, Tatiana Bogdanovich, Barbara Methé, Alison Morris, Bryan J McVerry, Georgios D Kitsios

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Gut Microbiome Modulates Body Temperature Both in Sepsis and Health.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Big Data in Gastroenterology Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine FairDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Daniel G DunlapDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Adam FitchCenter for Medicine and the Microbiome, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tatiana BogdanovichDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Barbara MethéDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Alison MorrisDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bryan J McVerryDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Georgios D KitsiosDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA kitsiosg@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Regulation of Cardiolin Byosynthesis in Epithelial InjuryP01HL114453 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MALLAMPALLI, RAMA K · 2014 to 2023
$21.3M
TNF-alpha Control of a Surfactant Enzyme in Lung InjuryR01HL081784 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MALLAMPALLI, RAMA K · 2006 to 2024
$5.4M
Sepsis-Associated Immune Suppression and F-box ProteinsR01HL097376 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MALLAMPALLI, RAMA K · 2009 to 2025
$5.1M
Pathogenesis of Obstruction/Emphysema and the Microbiome (POEM) in HIVU01HL098962 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GHEDIN, ELODIE, MORRIS, ALISON · 2009 to 2013
$3.8M
Microbiome-based diagnosis of pneumonia in the acute respiratory distress syndromeK23HL139987 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KITSIOS, GEORGIOS · 2018 to 2022
$806k
Mentoring and Patient-Oriented Research in HIV Obstructive Lung DiseaseK24HL123342 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MORRIS, ALISON · 2014 to 2018
$571k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL139987NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL123342NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL114453NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL081784NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL097376NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL098962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of the gut microbiome in critical illness is being actively investigated, but the optimal sampling methods for sequencing studies of gut microbiota remain unknown. Stool samples are generally considered the reference standard but are not practical to obtain in the intensive care unit (ICU), and thus, rectal swabs are often used. However, the reliability of rectal swabs for gut microbiome profiling has not been established in the ICU setting. In this study, we compared 16S rRNA gene sequencing results between rectal swab and stool samples collected at three time points from mechanically ventilated critically ill adults. Rectal swabs comprised 89% of the samples collected at the baseline time point, but stool samples became more extensively available at later time points. Significant differences in alpha-diversity and beta-diversity between rectal swabs and stool samples were observed, but these differences were primarily due to baseline samples. Higher relative abundances of members of the

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAgedBacteriaCritical IllnessFecesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRectumReproducibility of ResultsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASpecimen HandlingRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sgut dysbiosisgut microbiomemicrobiomerectal swabstool

Identifiers

PMID31341070
PMCPMC6656869
OpenAlexW2962868359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.