SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2019
Long term risk of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment for first unprovoked venous thromboembolism event: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06073366 (Long-term Surveillance of Patients With Venous Thromboembolism), which is not on this map. Cited by 123 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Long-term Surveillance of Patients With Venous Thromboembolism: a Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study
Who cites it
123 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of reduced-dose versus full-dose DOACs in extended treatment of VTE: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Pooled it
- Chinese expert consensus on prevention, diagnosis, and management of venous thromboembolism in adult burn patients (2024).Military Medical Research · 2025Guideline
- Duration of primary/secondary treatment to prevent recurrent venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood advances · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment-free survival after discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in mNSCLC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention of unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Annals of medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Idiopathic upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: A systematic review.European journal of haematology · 2022Pooled it
- Risk of recurrence in women with venous thromboembolism related to estrogen-containing contraceptives: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2022Pooled it
- Treatment-free survival after discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Thrombolytics for venous thromboembolic events: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Blood advances · 2020Pooled it
- Reduced-Dose Versus Full-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Extended Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Safety of expedited-surgery protocols in anticoagulant-treated patients with hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgiePooled it
- Potential association of TGFβ1 plasma levels and fibrinolysis parameters with the risk of recurrence and vascular obstruction after a first unprovoked pulmonary embolism episode.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Trial
- Bleeding Events During Anticoagulation After Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Real-Life Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Emerging strategies in venous thromboembolism: a narrative review of pharmacological innovations.Thrombosis journal · 2026Review
- Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants and Home Time After Venous Thromboembolism in Frail and Non-Frail Older Adults.American journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Accuracy of machine learning models in predicting recurrent venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Proteomic Biomarkers in VTE: From Discovery to Clinical Translation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- How to determine the optimal duration of anticoagulation for VTE: an evidence-based decision-analytical approach.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Venous Thromboembolism and Gut Dysbiosis: Mechanistic Links Between Endotoxemia, Microbial Metabolites, and Thromboinflammation.Nutrients · 2026Review
63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the rate of a first recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) event after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment in patients with a first episode of unprovoked VTE, and the cumulative incidence for recurrent VTE up to 10 years.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from inception to 15 March 2019). STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies reporting symptomatic recurrent VTE after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment in patients with a first unprovoked VTE event who had completed at least three months of treatment. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two investigators independently screened studies, extracted data, and appraised risk of bias. Data clarifications were sought from authors of eligible studies. Recurrent VTE events and person years of follow-up after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment were used to calculate rates for individual studies, and data were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Sex and site of initial VTE were investigated as potential sources of between study heterogeneity.
results18 studies involving 7515 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled rate of recurrent VTE per 100 person years after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment was 10.3 events (95% confidence interval 8.6 to 12.1) in the first year, 6.3 (5.1 to 7.7) in the second year, 3.8 events/year (95% confidence interval 3.2 to 4.5) in years 3-5, and 3.1 events/year (1.7 to 4.9) in years 6-10. The cumulative incidence for recurrent VTE was 16% (95% confidence interval 13% to 19%) at 2 years, 25% (21% to 29%) at 5 years, and 36% (28% to 45%) at 10 years. The pooled rate of recurrent VTE per 100 person years in the first year was 11.9 events (9.6 to 14.4) for men and 8.9 events (6.8 to 11.3) for women, with a cumulative incidence for recurrent VTE of 41% (28% to 56%) and 29% (20% to 38%), respectively, at 10 years. Compared to patients with isolated pulmonary embolism, the rate of recurrent VTE was higher in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis (rate ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.7) and in patients with pulmonary embolism plus deep vein thrombosis (1.5, 1.1 to 1.9). In patients with distal deep vein thrombosis, the pooled rate of recurrent VTE per 100 person years was 1.9 events (95% confidence interval 0.5 to 4.3) in the first year after anticoagulation had stopped. The case fatality rate for recurrent VTE was 4% (95% confidence interval 2% to 6%).
conclusionsIn patients with a first episode of unprovoked VTE who completed at least three months of anticoagulant treatment, the risk of recurrent VTE was 10% in the first year after treatment, 16% at two years, 25% at five years, and 36% at 10 years, with 4% of recurrent VTE events resulting in death. These estimates should inform clinical practice guidelines, enhance confidence in counselling patients of their prognosis, and help guide decision making about long term management of unprovoked VTE. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42017056309.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.