Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31340965›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

Multicentre cross-sectional observational registry to monitor the safety of early discharge after rule-out of acute myocardial infarction by copeptin and troponin: the Pro-Core registry.

Evangelos Giannitsis, Piers Clifford, Anna Slagman, Ralph Ruedelstein, Christoph Liebetrau, Christian Hamm, Didier Honnart, Kurt Huber, Jörn Ole Vollert, Carlo Simonelli and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02490969 (Copeptin Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02490969 completednot on this map

Copeptin Registry (proCORE) Biomarkers in Cardiology (BIC)-19

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2015 to 2017Enrolled2,256ConditionsAcute Myocardial InfarctionArmsRoutine management observation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Myocardial Infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Evangelos GiannitsisCardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Piers CliffordBuckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Amersham, UK.
Anna SlagmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine CVK, CCM and Department of Cardiology CVK, Charité Universitiy Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Ralph RuedelsteinCardiology, St. Elisabeth Krankenhaus, Mayen, Germany.
Christoph LiebetrauDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Centre, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Christian HammDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Centre, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Didier HonnartHôpital du Bocage, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France.
Kurt Huber3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Wilhelminenhospital, Vienna, Austria.
Jörn Ole VollertCardiovascular Biomarkers, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
Carlo SimonelliCardiovascular Biomarkers, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
Malte SchröderCardiology, Krankenhaus Hedwigshohe Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jan C WiemerCardiovascular Biomarkers, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
Matthias Mueller-HennessenCardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hinrich SchroerInternal Medicine and Cardiology, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kim KastnerDepartment of Emergency Medicine CVK, CCM and Department of Cardiology CVK, Charité Universitiy Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Martin MöckelDepartment of Emergency Medicine CVK, CCM and Department of Cardiology CVK, Charité Universitiy Medicine, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7691-3709
Biomark (United States) · USAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine · AUGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEHeidelberg University · DEBuckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust · GBCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECHU Dijon Bourgogne · FRSigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien · ATSt. Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Leipzig · DESt. Hedwig-Krankenhaus · DEUnfallkrankenhaus Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is sparse information on the safety of early primary discharge from the emergency department (ED) after rule-out of myocardial infarction in suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This prospective registry aimed to confirm randomised study results in patients at low-to-intermediate risk, with a broader spectrum of symptoms, across different institutional standards and with a range of local troponin assays including high-sensitivity cTn (hs-cTn), cardiac troponin (cTn) and point-of-care troponin (POC Tn).

designProspective, multicentre European registry.

setting18 emergency departments in nine European countries (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, Spain, UK, Turkey, Lithuania and Hungary)

participantsThe final study cohort consisted of 2294 patients (57.2% males, median age 57 years) with suspected ACS.

interventionsUsing the new dual markers strategy, 1477 patients were eligible for direct discharge, which was realised in 974 (42.5%) of patients.

main outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days.

resultsCompared with conventional workup after dual marker measurement, the median length of ED stay was 60 min shorter (228 min, 95% CI: 219 to 239 min vs 288 min, 95% CI: 279 to 300 min) in the primary dual marker strategy (DMS) discharge group. All-cause mortality was 0.1% (95% CI: 0% to 0.6%) in the primary DMS discharge group versus 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6% to 1.8%) in the conventional workup group after dual marker measurement. Conventional workup instead of discharge despite negative DMS biomarkers was observed in 503 patients (21.9%) and associated with higher prevalence of ACS (17.1% vs 0.9%, p<0.001), cardiac diagnoses (55.2% vs 23.5%, p<0.001) and risk factors (p<0.01), but with a similar all-cause mortality of 0.2% (95% CI: 0% to 1.1%) versus primary DMS discharge (p=0.64).

conclusionsCopeptin on top of cardiac troponin supports safe discharge in patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of ACS under routine conditions with the use of a broad spectrum of local standard POC, conventional and high-sensitivity troponin assays. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02490969.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersChest PainCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGlycopeptidesHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionProspective StudiesTroponin TBiomarkerscopeptinsGlycopeptidesTroponin Tacute coronary syndromecopeptinmortalitymyocardial infarctionregistrytroponin

Identifiers

PMID31340965
PMCPMC6661885
OpenAlexW2963210940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.