Observational studyBMJ open2019
Multicentre cross-sectional observational registry to monitor the safety of early discharge after rule-out of acute myocardial infarction by copeptin and troponin: the Pro-Core registry.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02490969 (Copeptin Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Copeptin Registry (proCORE) Biomarkers in Cardiology (BIC)-19
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Point-of-care testing improves care timeliness in the emergency department. A multicenter randomized clinical trial (study POCTUR).Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Diagnostic performance and risk assessment of combined copeptin and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I in Chinese emergency department.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Single- and Dual-Marker Strategies for Rapid Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Rule-Out Using Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C, Copeptin, and High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in the Emergency Department.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Evaluation of Novel Biomarkers Compared to ESC 0/1 h and 0/3 h Algorithms in Patients with Suspected Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Copeptin in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Is There a Role in the Era of High-Sensitivity Troponins?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Improvement of outcome prediction of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 by a dual marker strategy using high-sensitive cardiac troponin I and copeptin.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022Observational
- Copeptin as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Cardiovascular Diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Exosomal Composition, Biogenesis and Profiling Using Point-of-Care Diagnostics-Implications for Cardiovascular Disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- High-sensitivity troponin I with or without ultra-sensitive copeptin for the instant rule-out of acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Critical appraisal of the 2020 ESC guideline recommendations on diagnosis and risk assessment in patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021Article
- Instant rule-out of suspected non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T with Copeptin versus a single low high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T: findings from a large pooled individual data analysis on 10,329 patients.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021Article
- Prognostic Value of Elevated Copeptin and High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in Patients with and without Acute Coronary Syndrome: The ConTrACS Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Biomarkers for infarct diagnosis and rapid rule-out/rule-in of acute myocardial infarction.Herz · 2020Review
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Myocardial Infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
- The effect of a seven-step rehabilitation training program on cardiac function and quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThere is sparse information on the safety of early primary discharge from the emergency department (ED) after rule-out of myocardial infarction in suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This prospective registry aimed to confirm randomised study results in patients at low-to-intermediate risk, with a broader spectrum of symptoms, across different institutional standards and with a range of local troponin assays including high-sensitivity cTn (hs-cTn), cardiac troponin (cTn) and point-of-care troponin (POC Tn).
designProspective, multicentre European registry.
setting18 emergency departments in nine European countries (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, Spain, UK, Turkey, Lithuania and Hungary)
participantsThe final study cohort consisted of 2294 patients (57.2% males, median age 57 years) with suspected ACS.
interventionsUsing the new dual markers strategy, 1477 patients were eligible for direct discharge, which was realised in 974 (42.5%) of patients.
main outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days.
resultsCompared with conventional workup after dual marker measurement, the median length of ED stay was 60 min shorter (228 min, 95% CI: 219 to 239 min vs 288 min, 95% CI: 279 to 300 min) in the primary dual marker strategy (DMS) discharge group. All-cause mortality was 0.1% (95% CI: 0% to 0.6%) in the primary DMS discharge group versus 1.1% (95% CI: 0.6% to 1.8%) in the conventional workup group after dual marker measurement. Conventional workup instead of discharge despite negative DMS biomarkers was observed in 503 patients (21.9%) and associated with higher prevalence of ACS (17.1% vs 0.9%, p<0.001), cardiac diagnoses (55.2% vs 23.5%, p<0.001) and risk factors (p<0.01), but with a similar all-cause mortality of 0.2% (95% CI: 0% to 1.1%) versus primary DMS discharge (p=0.64).
conclusionsCopeptin on top of cardiac troponin supports safe discharge in patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of ACS under routine conditions with the use of a broad spectrum of local standard POC, conventional and high-sensitivity troponin assays. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02490969.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.