Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31340882›Full record

ArticleComparative medicine2019

Cadaveric Porcine Spines as a Model for the Human Epidural Space.

Jacob H Cole, Joanna E Fishback, Scott B Hughey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Comparative medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacob H Cole
Joanna E Fishback
Scott B Hughey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most patients who undergo epidural anesthesia are pregnant and thus a protected population, which has limited investigations of the human epidural space. Among the several species studied as models for the human spine, the porcine spine has been used as a model for spine instrumentation. Although the spread of colored dye within the porcine epidural space has been investigated, no model has demonstrated in situ spread by using radiopaque contrast dye. To this end, we here used 10 Yorkshire swine cadavers through an approved tissue sharing agreement. Epidural catheters were placed by using a landmark-based loss-of-resistance technique; placement was confirmed through radiography. The catheters were connected to epidural infusion pumps to ensure consistent dosing, 2-mL boluses of contrast dye were injected into the space, and radiographs were taken and recorded after each bolus. The total spread of the contrast dye was analyzed. We demonstrated consistent and reliable spread of fluid in the epidural space among the animals used, with low variability between animals of different weights. Our results support the use of the epidural space of cadaveric swine as a model for the human epidural space. Furthermore, the technique for epidural administration by using the landmark-based loss-of-resistance demonstrated in this model was validated, thus supporting future investigations of medication delivery into the epidural space.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalSwineAnesthesia, EpiduralAnimalsCadaverContrast MediaEpidural SpaceFemaleHumansContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID31340882
PMCPMC6733160
OpenAlexW2963892103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.