Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31340868›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2019

Association of sublingual microcirculation parameters and endothelial glycocalyx dimensions in resuscitated sepsis.

Alexandros Rovas, Laura Mareen Seidel, Hans Vink, Timo Pohlkötter, Hermann Pavenstädt, Christian Ertmer, Michael Hessler, Philipp Kümpers

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03960307 completednot on this map

Association of Sublingual Microcirculation Parameters and Endothelial Glycocalyx Dimensions in Resuscitated Sepsis: A Cross-sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital MuensterRan2017 to 2017Enrolled40ConditionsSepsisArmsMicrocirculation and Glycocalyx assessment
NCT04678193 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

COVID-19 Risk Assessment Hospitalization Outcomes Epidemiology Efficacy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAventyn, Inc.Ran2020 to 2026Enrolled27,000ConditionsCovid19ArmsCoromec Registry with ECL-19
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Biomarkers of endothelial glycocalyx dysfunction in pregnancy: a systematic review of clinical relevance and detection techniques.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandros RovasDepartment of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Laura Mareen SeidelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Hans VinkDepartment of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Timo PohlkötterDepartment of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Hermann PavenstädtDepartment of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Christian ErtmerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Michael HesslerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Muenster, Münster, Germany.
Philipp KümpersDepartment of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. philipp.kuempers@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9929-0703

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe endothelial glycocalyx (eGC) covers the luminal surface of the vascular endothelium and plays an important protective role in systemic inflammatory states and particularly in sepsis. Its breakdown leads to capillary leak and organ dysfunction. Moreover, sepsis-induced alterations of sublingual microcirculation are associated with a worse clinical outcome. The present study was performed to investigate the associations between eGC dimensions and established parameters of microcirculation dysfunction in sepsis.

methodsThis observational, prospective, cross-sectional study included 40 participants, of which 30 critically ill septic patients were recruited from intensive care units of a university hospital and 10 healthy volunteers served as controls. The established microcirculation parameters were obtained sublingually and analyzed according to the current recommendations. In addition, the perfused boundary region (PBR), an inverse parameter of the eGC dimensions, was measured sublingually, using novel data acquisition and analysis software (GlycoCheck™). Moreover, we exposed living endothelial cells to 5% serum from a subgroup of study participants, and the delta eGC breakdown, measured with atomic force microscopy (AFM), was correlated with the paired PBR values.

resultsIn septic patients, sublingual microcirculation was impaired, as indicated by a reduced microvascular flow index (MFI) and a reduced proportion of perfused vessels (PPV) compared to those in healthy controls (MFI, 2.93 vs 2.74, p = 0.002; PPV, 98.53 vs 92.58, p = 0.0004). PBR values were significantly higher in septic patients compared to those in healthy controls, indicating damage of the eGC (2.04 vs 2.34, p < 0.0001). The in vitro AFM data correlated exceptionally well with paired PBR values obtained at the bedside (rs = - 0.94, p = 0.02). Both PBR values and microcirculation parameters correlated well with the markers of critical illness. Interestingly, no association was observed between the PBR values and established microcirculation parameters.

conclusionOur findings suggest that eGC damage can occur independently of microcirculatory impairment as measured by classical consensus parameters. Further studies in critically ill patients are needed to unravel the relationship of glycocalyx damage and microvascular impairment, as well as their prognostic and therapeutic importance in sepsis.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03960307.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesEndothelial CellsFemaleGlycocalyxHumansMaleMicrocirculationMiddle AgedProspective StudiesResuscitationRetrospective StudiesSepsisBiomarkersEndothelial glycocalyxGlycosaminoglycansIncident dark field illumination imagingIntensive care unitIntravital microscopyMicrocirculationPBRPerfused boundary regionSepsisSidestream dark field microscopy

Identifiers

PMID31340868
PMCPMC6657098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.