Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31340836›Full record

ReviewGlobalization and health2019

Zika, abortion and health emergencies: a review of contemporary debates.

Clare Wenham, Amaral Arevalo, Ernestina Coast, Sonia Corrêa, Katherine Cuellar, Tiziana Leone, Sandra Valongueiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Globalization and health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Women, men and COVID-19.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Home Alone: Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak.Lancet (London, England) · 2020
    Article
  19. Are Pandemics Gender Neutral? Women's Health and COVID-19.Frontiers in global women's health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clare WenhamDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK. c.wenham@lse.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5378-3203
Amaral ArevaloInstituto de Medicina Social-Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier 524, Maracanã, Bloco D, 7° andar, UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 20550-013, Brazil.
Ernestina CoastDepartment of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Sonia CorrêaABIA, Sexuality Policy Watch, Avenida Presidente Vargas, 446, 13th floor, CEP 20071-907, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Katherine CuellarNational Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 62 #52-59, Medellín, Colombia.
Tiziana LeoneDepartment of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
Sandra ValongueiroPost-graduate Programe of Public Health, Federal University of Pernambuco, Av Prof Moraes Rego, s/n. Hospital das Clínicas, Bloco "E" - 4° Andar. Cidade Universitária CEP: 50.670-901, Recife, PE, Brazil.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 210308/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Zika outbreak provides pertinent case study for considering the impact of health emergencies on abortion decision-making and/or for positioning abortion in global health security debates. MAIN BODY: This paper provides a baseline of contemporary debates taking place in the intersection of two key health policy areas, and seeks to understand how health emergency preparedness frameworks and the broader global health security infrastructure is prepared to respond to future crises which implicate sexual and reproductive rights. Our paper suggests there are three key themes that emerge from the literature; 1) the lack of consideration of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in outbreak response 2) structural inequalities permeate the landscape of health emergencies, epitomised by Zika, and 3) the need for rights based approaches to health.

conclusionGlobal health security planning and response should specifically include programmatic activity for SRH provision during health emergencies.

Indexed as

Global HealthAbortion, InducedDisease OutbreaksDissent and DisputesFemaleHealth PolicyHumansPregnancyZika Virus InfectionAbortionHealth emergenciesReproductive rightsSexual and reproductive healthStructural violenceZika

Identifiers

PMID31340836
PMCPMC6657045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.