Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31340831›Full record

ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2019

The Kuopio idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus protocol: initial outcome of 175 patients.

A Junkkari, A J Luikku, N Danner, H K Jyrkkänen, T Rauramaa, V E Korhonen, A M Koivisto, O Nerg, M Kojoukhova, T J Huttunen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Utility of cortical tissue analysis in normal pressure hydrocephalus.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A JunkkariNeurosurgery of NeuroCenter, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), POB 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland. antti.junkkari@kuh.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-1749
A J LuikkuNeurosurgery of NeuroCenter, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), POB 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
N DannerNeurosurgery of NeuroCenter, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), POB 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
H K JyrkkänenNeurosurgery of NeuroCenter, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), POB 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
T RauramaaDepartment of Pathology, KUH and UEF, Kuopio, Finland.
V E KorhonenNeurosurgery of NeuroCenter, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), POB 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
A M KoivistoNeurology of NeuroCenter, KUH and UEF, Kuopio, Finland.
O NergNeurology of NeuroCenter, KUH and UEF, Kuopio, Finland.
M KojoukhovaNeurosurgery of NeuroCenter, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), POB 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
T J HuttunenNeurosurgery of NeuroCenter, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), POB 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
J E JääskeläinenNeurosurgery of NeuroCenter, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), POB 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
V LeinonenNeurosurgery of NeuroCenter, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), POB 100, 70029, Kuopio, Finland.
University of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting protocol is described together with the initial outcomes of 175 patients with probable iNPH treated according to this protocol from a defined population. Our secondary aim was to display the variety of differential diagnoses referred to the KUH iNPH outpatient clinic from 2010 until 2017.

methodsPatients were divided into four groups according to the prognostic tests: tap test (positive or negative) and infusion test (positive or negative). The short-term outcome was compared between groups. The 3-month outcome following shunt surgery was assessed by measuring gait speed improvement, using a 12-point iNPH grading scale (iNPHGS) and the 15D instrument.

resultsFrom 341 patients suspected of iNPH, 88 patients were excluded from further research mostly due to deviation from the protocol's gait assessment guidelines. Hence 253 patients with suspected iNPH were included in the study, 177/253 (70%) of whom were treated with a CSF shunt. A favorable clinical outcome following surgery was observed in 79-93% of patients depending on the prognostic group. A moderate association (Cramer's V = 0.32) was found between the gait speed improvement rate and the prognostic group (X

conclusionsOur results emphasize the importance of a systematic diagnostic and prognostic workup especially in cases with an atypical presentation of iNPH. Additional diagnostic testing may be required, but should not delay adequate care. Active surgical treatment is recommended in patients with a high clinical probability of iNPH. Other neurological conditions contributed to most of the non iNPH diagnoses.

Indexed as

AgedCerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsFemaleHumansHydrocephalus, Normal PressureMaleTreatment OutcomeComorbidityInfusion testNormal pressure hydrocephalusOutcomeTap test

Identifiers

PMID31340831
PMCPMC6657079
OpenAlexW2963856207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.