Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31340820›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2019

Evaluation of flow changes after telescopic stenting of a giant fusiform aneurysm of the vertebrobasilar junction.

Sergey Sindeev, Jan Stephan Kirschke, Sascha Prothmann, Sergey Frolov, Dieter Liepsch, Philipp Berg, Claus Zimmer, Benjamin Friedrich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safety and efficacy profile of off-label use of the Pipeline Embolization Device: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Giant Stent for Giant Cerebral Aneurysms-The AcceroJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sergey SindeevDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tambov State Technical University, Tambov, Russia.
Jan Stephan KirschkeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Sascha ProthmannDepartment of Neuroradiology, Helios Klinikum München West, Munich, Germany.
Sergey FrolovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tambov State Technical University, Tambov, Russia.
Dieter LiepschDepartment of Building Services Engineering, Munich University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany.
Philipp BergResearch Campus STIMULATE, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Claus ZimmerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Benjamin FriedrichDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. benjamin.friedrich@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2198-9925
TUM Klinikum · DETambov State Technical University · RUMünchen Klinik · DEMunich University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DE

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 16-15-10327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of flow-diverters for non-saccular cerebral posterior circulation aneurysms requires complex deployment techniques and is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Therefore, further studies are required to clarify the effect of stenting on post-treatment hemodynamics in such aneurysms. In this study, we evaluated flow alterations in a treated giant fusiform aneurysm of the vertebrobasilar junction and correlated them with the clinical outcome.

methodsA patient-specific aneurysm model was acquired by rotational angiography, and three SILK flow-diverters (4.5 × 40, 5 × 40 and 5.5 × 40 mm) were virtually deployed in series along the basilar and right vertebral arteries. Image-based blood flow simulations before and after the treatment were performed under realistic pulsatile flow conditions. The flow reduction, velocity and wall shear stress (WSS) distribution, streamlines and WSS-derived parameters were evaluated before and after the treatment.

resultsThe computed velocity streamlines showed substantial alterations of the flow pattern in the aneurysm and successful redirection of blood flow along the series of flow-diverters with no flow through the overlapping stents. The obtained flow reduction of 86% was sufficient to create thrombogenic flow conditions. Moreover, a 6.2-fold increase in relative residence time and a decrease by 87% of time-averaged WSS contributed to a successful treatment outcome observed during the follow-up.

conclusionsWe found a correlation between the numerically predicted flow alterations and the available treatment outcome. This shows the potential of image-based simulations to be used in clinical practice for treatment planning and estimation of possible risk factors associated with a complex stent deployment in fusiform aneurysms of the posterior circulation.

Indexed as

HemodynamicsStentsAngiographyComputer SimulationHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIntracranial AneurysmTreatment OutcomeVertebral ArteryComputational fluid dynamicsFlow-diverterFusiform aneurysmIntracranial aneurysmPosterior circulationVertebrobasilar junction

Identifiers

PMID31340820
PMCPMC6657177
OpenAlexW2963582217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.