Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31340796›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019

Building a tobacco user registry by extracting multiple smoking behaviors from clinical notes.

Ellen L Palmer, Saeed Hassanpour, John Higgins, Jennifer A Doherty, Tracy Onega

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A case study in applying artificial intelligence-based named entity recognition to develop an automated ophthalmic disease registry.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Oral Human Papillomavirus: a multisite infection.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ellen L PalmerDartmouth College, HB 7922, 03755, Hanover, NH, USA. elp76@case.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3314-986X
Saeed HassanpourDartmouth College, HB 7261, 03755, Hanover, NH, USA.
John HigginsDartmouth College, HB 7920, 03755, Hanover, NH, USA.
Jennifer A DohertyHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Tracy OnegaDartmouth College, HB 7927, 03755, Hanover, NH, USA.

Funding

Informatics for Integrating Biology/ the Bedside (RMI)U54LM008748 · NLM · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S. · 2004 to 2013
$39.0M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002549 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HARDING, CLIFFORD V · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002549NLM NIH HHS U54 LM008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsage of structured fields in Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to ascertain smoking history is important but fails in capturing the nuances of smoking behaviors. Knowledge of smoking behaviors, such as pack year history and most recent cessation date, allows care providers to select the best care plan for patients at risk of smoking attributable diseases.

methodsWe developed and evaluated a health informatics pipeline for identifying complete smoking history from clinical notes in EHRs. We utilized 758 patient-visit notes (from visits between 03/28/2016 and 04/04/2016) from our local EHR in addition to a public dataset of 502 clinical notes from the 2006 i2b2 Challenge to assess the performance of this pipeline. We used a machine-learning classifier to extract smoking status and a comprehensive set of text processing regular expressions to extract pack years and cessation date information from these clinical notes.

resultsWe identified smoking status with an F1 score of 0.90 on both the i2b2 and local data sets. Regular expression identification of pack year history in the local test set was 91.7% sensitive and 95.2% specific, but due to variable context the pack year extraction was incomplete in 25% of cases, extracting packs per day or years smoked only. Regular expression identification of cessation date was 63.2% sensitive and 94.6% specific.

conclusionsOur work indicates that the development of an EHR-based Smokers' Registry containing information relating to smoking behaviors, not just status, from free-text clinical notes using an informatics pipeline is feasible. This pipeline is capable of functioning in external EHRs, reducing the amount of time and money needed at the institute-level to create a Smokers' Registry for improved identification of patient risk and eligibility for preventative and early detection services.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsRegistriesCigarette SmokingDatasets as TopicHumansMachine LearningMedical InformaticsNatural Language ProcessingElectronic health recordsInformatics pipelineNatural language processingSmokers registry

Identifiers

PMID31340796
PMCPMC6657102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.