ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019
Building a tobacco user registry by extracting multiple smoking behaviors from clinical notes.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Extracting social determinants of health from electronic health records using natural language processing: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Pooled it
- Review
- Natural Language Processing for Substance Use Disorder Information Extraction: A Systematic Literature Review.Current addiction reports · 2026Review
- Leveraging large language models to extract smoking history from clinical notes for lung cancer surveillance.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Influence of AI on Advancements in Respiratory Care: Narrative Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2024Review
- A case study in applying artificial intelligence-based named entity recognition to develop an automated ophthalmic disease registry.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- Smoking is a predictor of complications in all types of surgery: a machine learning-based big data study.BJS open · 2023Article
- Design considerations for a hierarchical semantic compositional framework for medical natural language understanding.PloS one · 2023Article
- A method to advance adolescent sexual health research: Automated algorithm finds sexual history documentation.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Using Electronic Medical Records to Identify Potentially Eligible Study Subjects for Lung Cancer Screening with Biomarkers.Cancers · 2021Article
- Oral Human Papillomavirus: a multisite infection.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2020Article
- Assessing data availability and quality within an electronic health record system through external validation against an external clinical data source.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUsage of structured fields in Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to ascertain smoking history is important but fails in capturing the nuances of smoking behaviors. Knowledge of smoking behaviors, such as pack year history and most recent cessation date, allows care providers to select the best care plan for patients at risk of smoking attributable diseases.
methodsWe developed and evaluated a health informatics pipeline for identifying complete smoking history from clinical notes in EHRs. We utilized 758 patient-visit notes (from visits between 03/28/2016 and 04/04/2016) from our local EHR in addition to a public dataset of 502 clinical notes from the 2006 i2b2 Challenge to assess the performance of this pipeline. We used a machine-learning classifier to extract smoking status and a comprehensive set of text processing regular expressions to extract pack years and cessation date information from these clinical notes.
resultsWe identified smoking status with an F1 score of 0.90 on both the i2b2 and local data sets. Regular expression identification of pack year history in the local test set was 91.7% sensitive and 95.2% specific, but due to variable context the pack year extraction was incomplete in 25% of cases, extracting packs per day or years smoked only. Regular expression identification of cessation date was 63.2% sensitive and 94.6% specific.
conclusionsOur work indicates that the development of an EHR-based Smokers' Registry containing information relating to smoking behaviors, not just status, from free-text clinical notes using an informatics pipeline is feasible. This pipeline is capable of functioning in external EHRs, reducing the amount of time and money needed at the institute-level to create a Smokers' Registry for improved identification of patient risk and eligibility for preventative and early detection services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.