Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31340777›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2019

Statin use and the risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers: a meta-analysis.

Yizi Wang, Fang Ren, Zixuan Song, Peng Chen, Shuang Liu, Ling Ouyang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Statins as Repurposed Drugs in Gynecological Cancer: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The emerging role of cholesterol metabolism in gynecologic cancer development and therapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The Role of Statins in the Prevention of Ovarian and Endometrial Cancers.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yizi WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.
Fang RenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.
Zixuan SongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.
Peng ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.
Shuang LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China.
Ling OuyangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, People's Republic of China. ouyl@sj-hospital.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6551-8773

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81501235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe relationship between statin use and the risk of ovarian or endometrial cancer remains controversial. Here, we investigated the relationship between statin use and the risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers.

methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis using articles retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. All original comparative studies published in English that were related to statin use and the risk of ovarian or endometrial cancer were included.

resultsThis meta-analysis included 19 studies enrolling 1,999,362 female subjects and 19,849 cancer cases (7,948 ovarian cancer cases and 11,901 endometrial cancer cases). The overall analysis indicated that statin use did not significantly reduce the risk of ovarian cancer [relative risk (RR) = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.03, p = 0.12] or the risk of endometrial cancer (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-1.00, p = 0.05.) Subgroup analyses based on study type, percentage of cancer cases, study location, and quality of studies also supported our conclusions. No association was found between long-term statin use (> 5 years) and the risk of ovarian cancer (RR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.51-1.04, p = 0.08) or endometrial cancer (RR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.58-1.08, p = 0.14).

conclusionsStatin use did not lower the risk of ovarian cancer or endometrial cancer. The long-term use of statins (> 5 years) was not associated with a reduction in the risk of ovarian or endometrial cancer.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIncidenceOvarian NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsEndometrial cancerOvarian cancerStatin

Identifiers

PMID31340777
PMCPMC6657066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.