Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31340770›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Consensus on priorities in maternal education: results of Delphi and nominal group technique approaches.

Carmen Paz-Pascual, Isabel Artieta-Pinedo, Gonzalo Grandes, ema.Q Group

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development and validation of educational multimedia to promote public health literacy about healthy cognitive aging.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Birth outcomes by type of attendance at antenatal education: An observational study.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2022
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of maternal nutrition in viral infections during pregnancy.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carmen Paz-PascualAtención Primaria en Salud, Prevención y Enfermedades Crónicas, IIS Biocruces Bizkaia, Plaza de Cruces 12. 48903, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain. mariacarmen.pazpascual@osakidetza.eus.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9170-0667
Isabel Artieta-PinedoAtención Primaria en Salud, Prevención y Enfermedades Crónicas, IIS Biocruces Bizkaia, Plaza de Cruces 12. 48903, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Gonzalo GrandesAtención Primaria en Salud, Prevención y Enfermedades Crónicas, IIS Biocruces Bizkaia, Plaza de Cruces 12. 48903, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
ema.Q Group
BioCruces Health research Institute · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI13/02632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal education is wide-ranging and covers many areas from pregnancy to the immediate postpartum period and childrearing. However, for it to be effective, more resources need to be assigned to key topics. The goal of this study was to identify and prioritize the most important issues in maternal education, so that specific objectives could subsequently be set and learning outcomes evaluated.

methodsWe drew up a comprehensive list of topics addressed in existing maternal education programs, based on a systematic review of information obtained from the Internet and the experience of the research team. The topics were presented to a multidisciplinary panel whose members were asked to rate them from 1 to 9, and consensus of opinion was reached using a two-round Delphi survey, with consensus defined beforehand as 80% agreement among panelists in awarding a score of 7, 8 or 9. The most highly-rated topics were then discussed and again prioritized by a multidisciplinary team of healthcare and non-healthcare experts, using a nominal group technique.

resultsInitially, 650 topics were identified and grouped into 80 categories which were then prioritized by 54 healthcare and non-healthcare experts using a Delphi survey with a study participation rate of around 20%. 63 topics were considered very important, so criteria were restricted and only the 24 highest-scoring selected (95% of agreement on scores ≥7 or 80% of agreement on scores ≥8). Using the nominal group technique, a group of 12 experts identified the following priorities: initiation and establishment of breastfeeding, development of a birth plan, identification of problems and self-care postpartum, nutrition and a healthy lifestyle, options for pain management in labor and birth and characteristics of a normal newborn/looking after a newborn baby.

conclusionThis study, with a Delphi study and the Consensus among Experts: the nominal group technique, has succeeded in identifying priority topics in maternal education. We need to assess women's needs in relation to these topics, design an intervention to respond to these needs and evaluate its effectiveness.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMothersPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CarePrenatal EducationDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansPregnancySystematic Reviews as TopicDelphi techniqueHealth prioritiesPrenatal education

Identifiers

PMID31340770
PMCPMC6657030
OpenAlexW2963628128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.