Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2019
A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of probiotics in post-surgical colorectal cancer.
Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03782428 (Probiotic Effects On Clinical and Circulating Inflammatory Cytokines Status In Patients With Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 149 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Probiotic Effects On Clinical and Circulating Inflammatory Cytokines Status In Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Randomised Double Blind Clinical Trial
Who cites it
149 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 273 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy of probiotics or synbiotics supplementation on chemotherapy-induced complications and gut microbiota dysbiosis in gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of the efficacy of probiotics in the chemoradiotherapy of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Perioperative Probiotics Application for Preventing Postoperative Complications in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Pooled it
- A network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine on intestinal flora in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Pooled it
- Oral Administration of Probiotics Reduces Chemotherapy-Induced Diarrhea and Oral Mucositis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Orally Administered Probiotics in the Prevention of Chemotherapy (± Radiotherapy)-Induced Gastrointestinal Toxicity: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Integrative cancer therapiesPooled it
- Perioperative administration of CBM588 in colorectal cancer radical surgery: A single-center, randomized controlled trial.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Use of Nutraceuticals in Elderly to Fight Inflammation and Immuno-Senescence: A Randomized Case-Control Study.Nutrients · 2022Trial
- Novel targets in rectal cancer by considering lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network in response to Lactobacillus acidophilus consumption: a randomized clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Improvement Effect ofFrontiers in immunology · 2022Trial
- The Effect of Probiotics (MCPNutrients · 2021Trial
- Risk factors and prediction model for early high-output stoma after colorectal cancer surgery: A retrospective study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Microbial Signals in Cancer: Dissecting Host-Microbiota-Tumor Interactions and Potential Therapeutic Strategy.MedComm · 2026Review
- The Preventive Effect of Introducing Glutamine on Chemotherapy-Induced Diarrhea in Colorectal Cancer and Its Influence on Inflammatory Factors Such as CRP and IL-6.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2026Article
89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOur study aimed to determine the effect of probiotic consumption containing six viable microorganisms of 30 × 10
methodsFifty-two patients with colorectal cancer were randomized at four weeks after surgery to receive either a placebo (n = 25) or 30 billion colony-forming unit (CFU) of a mixture of six viable strains including 107 mg of Lactobacillus acidophilus BCMC® 12,130, Lactobacillus lactis BCMC® 12,451, Lactobacillus casei subsp BCMC® 12,313, Bifidobacterium longum BCMC® 02120, Bifidobacterium bifidum BCMC® 02290 and Bifidobacterium infantis BCMC® 02129 (n = 27). Patients were instructed to take the product orally twice daily for six months. Infection status, diarrhea or hospital admission were recorded throughout the study. Blood was taken pre- and post-intervention to measure TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17A, IL-17C and IL-22 using ELISA multiplex kit.
resultsThe majority of cases (~ 70%) were in Duke's C colorectal cancer for both groups. No surgical infection occurred and no antibiotics were required. Chemotherapy induced diarrhea was observed in both groups. Significant reduction in the level of pro-inflammatory cytokine, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17A, IL-17C and IL-22 were observed in CRC patients who received probiotics as compared to pre-treatment level (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the IFN-γ in both groups.
conclusionsWe have shown that probiotics containing six viable microorganisms of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria strains are safe to be consumed at four weeks after surgery in colorectal cancer patients and have reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines (except for IFN-gamma). Probiotic may modify intestinal microenvironment resulting in a decline in pro-inflammatory cytokines.
trial registrationNCT03782428; retrospectively registered on 20th December 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.