Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31340695›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Favorable Trend of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Service Life in a Large Single-Nation Population: Insights From 10-Year Analysis of the Italian Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry.

Stefano Poli, Giuseppe Boriani, Massimo Zecchin, Domenico Facchin, Maurizio Gasparini, Maurizio Landolina, Renato Pietro Ricci, Corrado Lanera, Dario Gregori, Alessandro Proclemer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Worldwide data analysis of BIOTRONIK ICD and CRT-D battery longevity.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Automatic measurement of short-term variability of repolarization to indicate ventricular arrhythmias in a porcine model of cardiac ischaemia.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stefano PoliCardiology Division Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine and IRCAB Foundation Udine Italy.
Giuseppe BorianiCardiology Division Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Policlinico di Modena Modena Italy.
Massimo ZecchinCardiovascular Department Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste Trieste Italy.
Domenico FacchinCardiology Division Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine and IRCAB Foundation Udine Italy.
Maurizio GaspariniElectrophysiology and Pacing Unit Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS Rozzano Italy.
Maurizio LandolinaCardiology Department Ospedale Maggiore Crema Italy.
Renato Pietro RicciCCU-Cardiology Department Presidio Ospedaliero San Filippo Neri Roma Italy.
Corrado LaneraBiostatistic Unit Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health University of Padova Italy.
Dario GregoriBiostatistic Unit Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health University of Padova Italy.
Alessandro ProclemerCardiology Division Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine and IRCAB Foundation Udine Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are widely employed for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Despite technological improvements, patients often need to undergo generator replacement, which entails the risk of periprocedural complications. Our aim was to estimate the service life of ICDs over a 10-year interval and to assess the main causes of replacement on the basis of data from the National ICD Registry of the Italian Society of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC). Methods and Results The registry includes data from over 400 hospitals in Italy. We included all patients who underwent device replacement from calendar years 2007 to 2016. The median service life of the ICDs and its trend over the years was estimated across the 3 types of devices (single-chamber, dual-chamber, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator) and the indication to implantation. The causes of replacement were also analyzed. We included 29 158 records from 27 676 patients (80.9% men; mean age at device replacement 65.8±12.0 years). The median service life was 57.3 months (interquartile range 27.8 months). Over the years, service life showed an increasing trend. The majority of patients underwent elective replacement because of battery end of life, and over the years there was a significant reduction of replacement for recalls, erosion/infections, and cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrading. Conclusions Our data from a large single-nation population showed that the trend of ICD service life, independently from ICD type, indication, and settings, significantly improved over time. Moreover, there was a striking reduction of interventions for upgrading and infection/erosion. This favorable trend has important clinical, organizational, and financial implications.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableAgedDeath, Sudden, CardiacFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesTime Factorsimplantable cardioverter‐defibrillatorlongevityregistry

Identifiers

PMID31340695
PMCPMC6761663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.