Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31340548›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Does the Femoral Head Size in Hip Arthroplasty Influence Lower Body Movements during Squats, Gait and Stair Walking? A Clinical Pilot Study Based on Wearable Motion Sensors.

Helena Grip, Kjell G Nilsson, Charlotte K Häger, Ronnie Lundström, Fredrik Öhberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biomechanical Assessment of Functional Tasks Beyond Level Walking Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helena GripDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden. Helena.Grip@regionvasterbotten.se.
Kjell G NilssonDepartment of surgical and perioperative sciences, Umeå university, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Charlotte K HägerDepartment of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Ronnie LundströmDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4918-9081
Fredrik ÖhbergDepartment of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University · SE

Funding

European Research and Development Fund 158715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hip prosthesis design with larger femoral head size may improve functional outcomes compared to the conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA) design. Our aim was to compare the range of motion (RoM) in lower body joints during squats, gait and stair walking using a wearable movement analysis system based on inertial measurement units (IMUs) in three age-matched male groups: 6 males with a conventional THA (THAC), 9 with a large femoral head (LFH) design, and 8 hip- and knee-asymptomatic controls (CTRL). We hypothesized that the LFH design would allow a greater hip RoM, providing movement patterns more like CTRL, and a larger side difference in hip RoM in THAC when compared to LFH and controls. IMUs were attached to the pelvis, thighs and shanks during five trials of squats, gait, and stair ascending/descending performed at self-selected speed. THAC and LFH participants completed the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). The results showed a larger hip RoM during squats in LFH compared to THAC. Side differences in LFH and THAC groups (operated vs. non-operated side) indicated that movement function was not fully recovered in either group, further corroborated by non-maximal mean HOOS scores (LFH: 83 ± 13, THAC: 84 ± 19 groups, vs. normal function 100). The IMU system may have the potential to enhance clinical movement evaluations as an adjunct to clinical scales.

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesAccelerometryAdultAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemur HeadGaitHip JointHumansMiddle AgedMovementPilot ProjectsProsthesis DesignWalkingaccelerometersgyroscopesMEMSmovement analysistotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID31340548
PMCPMC6679514
OpenAlexW2963451077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.