Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31340507›Full record

ReviewCancers2019

Emerging Roles of RAD52 in Genome Maintenance.

Manisha Jalan, Kyrie S Olsen, Simon N Powell

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manisha JalanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4467-4934
Kyrie S OlsenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7867-6102
Simon N PowellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. powells@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
The Response to a Site-Specific Blocked DNA Replication Fork in Human CancersR01CA187069 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI POWELL, SIMON N. · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Breast Cancer Research Foundation 16-070NCI NIH HHS CA187069NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The maintenance of genome integrity is critical for cell survival. Homologous recombination (HR) is considered the major error-free repair pathway in combatting endogenously generated double-stranded lesions in DNA. Nevertheless, a number of alternative repair pathways have been described as protectors of genome stability, especially in HR-deficient cells. One of the factors that appears to have a role in many of these pathways is human RAD52, a DNA repair protein that was previously considered to be dispensable due to a lack of an observable phenotype in knock-out mice. In later studies, RAD52 deficiency has been shown to be synthetically lethal with defects in BRCA genes, making RAD52 an attractive therapeutic target, particularly in the context of BRCA-deficient tumors.

Indexed as

BRCA1BRCA2DNA repairdouble-strand break repairgenome instabilityRAD51RAD52R-loopsRNA:DNA hybridssynthetic lethality

Identifiers

PMID31340507
PMCPMC6679097
OpenAlexW2964233552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.