Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31340470›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Development of a Spatial Discount Task to Measure Impulsive Choices in Dogs.

Paolo Mongillo, Anna Scandurra, Carla Jade Eatherington, Biagio D'Aniello, Lieta Marinelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paolo MongilloLaboratorio di Etologia Applicata, Dipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata e Alimentazione, Università degli Studi di Padova. Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8599-4005
Anna ScandurraLaboratorio di Etologia Applicata, Dipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata e Alimentazione, Università degli Studi di Padova. Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Carla Jade EatheringtonLaboratorio di Etologia Applicata, Dipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata e Alimentazione, Università degli Studi di Padova. Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-8116
Biagio D'AnielloDipartimento di Biologia, Università di Napoli Federico II, Via Cinthia, Edificio 7, 80126 Napoli, Italy.
Lieta MarinelliLaboratorio di Etologia Applicata, Dipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata e Alimentazione, Università degli Studi di Padova. Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy. lieta.marinelli@unipd.it.

Funding

Università degli Studi di Padova BIRD178748/17Università degli Studi di Padova CPDA144871/14Università degli Studi di Padova CPDR148844/14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impulsive choices reflect an individual's tendency to prefer a smaller immediate reward over a larger delayed one. Here, we have developed a behavioural test which can be easily applied to assess impulsive choices in dogs. Dogs were trained to associate one of two equidistant locations with a larger food amount when a smaller amount was presented in the other location, then the smaller amount was placed systematically closer to the dog. Choices of the smaller amount, as a function of distance, were considered a measure of the dog's tendency to make impulsive choices. All dogs (N = 48) passed the learning phase and completed the entire assessment in under 1 h. Choice of the smaller food amount increased as this was placed closer to the dog. Choices were independent from food motivation, past training, and speed of learning the training phase; supporting the specificity of the procedure. Females showed a higher probability of making impulsive choices, in agreement with analogue sex differences found in human and rodent studies, and supporting the external validity of our assessment. Overall, the findings support the practical applicability and represent a first indication of the validity of this method, making it suitable for investigations into impulsivity in dogs.

Indexed as

behavioral testdogimpulsivitylearningsex differencesvalidation

Identifiers

PMID31340470
PMCPMC6680670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.