ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2019
Development of an educational mobile application for patients submitted to orthognathic surgery.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review of Smartphone Applications That Address Patient Care in the Peri-Operative Period.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development and validation of Baritrip: a multidisciplinary educational mobile application for bariatric surgery patients.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2025Article
- Advanced outcomes of mixed reality usage in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- A Health App for Evidence-Based Postpartum Information: Development and Validation Study.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Telemedicine in Surgical Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.World journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Patient triage system for supporting the operation of dispatch centres and rescue teams.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Usability of Mobile Health Apps for Postoperative Care: Systematic Review.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveto develop, evaluate and correlate the acceptability of an educational mobile application to patients submitted to orthognathic surgery.
methodmethodological study based on systematic instructional design with contents aimed at patient learning through a mobile application. Usability and user satisfaction were evaluated by 30 patients in the perioperative stage through an electronic questionnaire sent by social networks, e-mail and business card, measured using the System Usability Scale instrument validated in Portuguese and user satisfaction with an instrument based on another study, after its applications. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and Spearman correlation.
resultsthe application named "OrtogApp" features content validated in a previous study included five learning content sessions essential for managing perioperative care, and it is available on IOS and Android platforms. Usability corresponded to 79.8 + 15.4 points and the satisfaction index was 82.9%; correlation of age, schooling and uses of the application with the instruments was not significant.
conclusionOrtogApp is an educational application with content validated by professionals, resulting in high user satisfaction and good usability. Patients may use the application as supportive educational material to supplement guidance provided by perioperative nurses and/or surgeons during perioperative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.