Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31339936›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Gaining ecological insight on dietary allocation among horseshoe bats through molecular primer combination.

Miren Aldasoro, Inazio Garin, Nerea Vallejo, Unai Baroja, Aitor Arrizabalaga-Escudero, Urtzi Goiti, Joxerra Aihartza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miren AldasoroDepartment of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, The Basque Country.
Inazio GarinDepartment of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, The Basque Country.
Nerea VallejoDepartment of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, The Basque Country.
Unai BarojaDepartment of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, The Basque Country.
Aitor Arrizabalaga-EscuderoDepartment of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, The Basque Country.
Urtzi GoitiDepartment of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, The Basque Country.
Joxerra AihartzaDepartment of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, The Basque Country.ORCID 0000-0003-0882-8964
University of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge on the trophic interactions among predators and their prey is important in order to understand ecology and behaviour of animals. Traditionally studies on the diet composition of insectivorous bats have been based on the morphological identification of prey remains, but the accuracy of the results has been hampered due to methodological limitations. Lately, the DNA metabarcoding and High Throughput Sequencing (HTS) techniques have changed the scene since they allows prey identification to the species level, ultimately giving more precision to the results. Nevertheless, the use of one single primer set to amplify faecal DNA produces biases in the assessed dietary composition. Three horseshoe bats overlap extensively in their distribution range in Europe: Rhinolophus euryale, R. hipposideros and R. ferrumequinum. In order to achieve the deepest insight on their prey list we combined two different primers. Results showed that the used primers were complementary at the order and species levels, only 22 out of 135 prey species being amplified by both. The most frequent prey of R. hipposideros belonged to Diptera and Lepidoptera, to Lepidoptera in R. euryale, and Lepidoptera, Diptera and Coleoptera in R. ferrumequinum. The three bats show significant resource partitioning, since their trophic niche overlap is not higher than 34%. Our results confirm the importance of combining complementary primers to describe the diet of generalist insectivorous bats with amplicon metabarcoding techniques. Overall, each primer set showed a subset of the prey composition, with a small portion of the total prey being identified by both of them. Therefore, each primer presented a different picture of the niche overlap among the three horseshoe bats due to their taxonomic affinity.

Indexed as

DietGenes, InsectMetagenomeAnimalsChiropteraColeopteraDipteraDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA PrimersFood ChainLepidopteraMetagenomicsDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID31339936
PMCPMC6656351
OpenAlexW2963928659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.