Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31339899›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Hiding in plain sight: New virus genomes discovered via a systematic analysis of fungal public transcriptomes.

Kerrigan B Gilbert, Emily E Holcomb, Robyn L Allscheid, James C Carrington

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
18.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 219 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Journal of general virology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Identification of a novelVirusdisease · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kerrigan B GilbertDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Emily E HolcombDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Robyn L AllscheidDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1501-4352
James C CarringtonDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3572-129X
Donald Danforth Plant Science Center · US

Funding

Genetic Analysis of RNA Virus-Host InteractionR37AI043288 · NIAID · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CARRINGTON, JAMES C · 2008 to 2017
$3.1M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF RNA VIRUS-HOST INTERACTIONR01AI043288 · NIAID · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CARRINGTON, JAMES C · 1998 to 2007
$1.7M
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF RNA VIRUS-HOST INTERACTIONR21AI043288 · NIAID · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CARRINGTON, JAMES C · 1997 to 1997
–
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI043288NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI043288NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI043288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distribution and diversity of RNA viruses in fungi is incompletely understood due to the often cryptic nature of mycoviral infections and the focused study of primarily pathogenic and/or economically important fungi. As most viruses that are known to infect fungi possess either single-stranded or double-stranded RNA genomes, transcriptomic data provides the opportunity to query for viruses in diverse fungal samples without any a priori knowledge of virus infection. Here we describe a systematic survey of all transcriptomic datasets from fungi belonging to the subphylum Pezizomycotina. Using a simple but effective computational pipeline that uses reads discarded during normal RNA-seq analyses, followed by identification of a viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) motif in de novo assembled contigs, 59 viruses from 44 different fungi were identified. Among the viruses identified, 88% were determined to be new species and 68% are, to our knowledge, the first virus described from the fungal species. Comprehensive analyses of both nucleotide and inferred protein sequences characterize the phylogenetic relationships between these viruses and the known set of mycoviral sequences and support the classification of up to four new families and two new genera. Thus the results provide a deeper understanding of the scope of mycoviral diversity while also increasing the distribution of fungal hosts. Further, this study demonstrates the suitability of analyzing RNA-seq data to facilitate rapid discovery of new viruses.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralBase SequenceDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesFungiOpen Reading FramesPhylogenyRNA, Double-StrandedRNA, ViralTranscriptomeDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesRNA, Double-StrandedRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID31339899
PMCPMC6655640
OpenAlexW2963287394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.