ArticleMolecular ecology resources2019
Multi-individual microsatellite identification: A multiple genome approach to microsatellite design (MiMi).
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- pSTRminer: integrated bioinformatic software for genome-wide identification and population-scale evaluation of polymorphic short tandem repeats.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Pan-SSR architecture in Acrossocheilus fasciatus links cross-assembly repeat conservation, repeat-unit count variation, and genomic context.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2026Article
- Conservation of Native Livestock Breeds in Russia: Current State and Promising Prospects.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Complete mitochondrial genome assembly and comparative analysis of Fagopyrum dibotrys (Golden Buckwheat).BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Microsatellite development for Theridion evexum (Araneae: Theridiidae) using low-coverage genome sequencing and the MiMi script.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- What are microsatellites and how to choose the best tool: a user-friendly review of SSR and 74 SSR mining tools.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Novel Microsatellite Loci, Cross-Species Validation of Multiplex Assays, and By-Catch Mitochondrial Genomes onInsects · 2023Article
- Pipeline for developing polymorphic microsatellites in species without reference genomes.3 Biotech · 2022Article
- Article
- A pipeline for effectively developing highly polymorphic simple sequence repeats markers based on multi-sample genomic data.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Automating microsatellite screening and primer design from multi-individual libraries using Micro-Primers.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Characterization of Microsatellites in theFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Development of the first microsatellite markers using high-throughput sequencing for a hexaploid coastal species, Tournefortia argentea L. f. (Boraginaceae).Molecular biology reports · 2021Article
- Multi-individual microsatellite identification: A multiple genome approach to microsatellite design (MiMi).Molecular ecology resources · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bespoke microsatellite marker panels are increasingly affordable and tractable to researchers and conservationists. The rate of microsatellite discovery is very high within a shotgun genomic data set, but extensive laboratory testing of markers is required for confirmation of amplification and polymorphism. By incorporating shotgun next-generation sequencing data sets from multiple individuals of the same species, we have developed a new method for the optimal design of microsatellite markers. This new tool allows us to increase the rate at which suitable candidate markers are selected by 58% in direct comparisons and facilitate an estimated 16% reduction in costs associated with producing a novel microsatellite panel. Our method enables the visualisation of each microsatellite locus in a multiple sequence alignment allowing several important quality checks to be made. Polymorphic loci can be identified and prioritised. Loci containing fragment-length-altering mutations in the flanking regions, which may invalidate assumptions regarding the model of evolution underlying variation at the microsatellite, can be avoided. Priming regions containing point mutations can be detected and avoided, helping to reduce sample-site-marker specificity arising from genetic isolation, and the likelihood of null alleles occurring. We demonstrate the utility of this new approach in two species: an echinoderm and a bird. Our method makes a valuable contribution towards minimising genotyping errors and reducing costs associated with developing a novel marker panel. The Python script to perform our method of multi-individual microsatellite identification (MiMi) is freely available from GitHub (https://github.com/graemefox/mimi).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.