Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31339591›Full record

SynthesisChild: care, health and development2019

Experiences of interventions aiming to improve the mental health and well-being of children and young people with a long-term physical condition: A systematic review and meta-ethnography.

Liz Shaw, Darren Moore, Michael Nunns, Jo Thompson Coon, Tamsin Ford, Vashti Berry, Erin Walker, Isobel Heyman, Christopher Dickens, Sophie Bennett and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child: care, health and development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Liz ShawUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6092-5019
Darren MooreGraduate School of Education, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Michael NunnsEvidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Jo Thompson CoonEvidence Synthesis & Modelling for Health Improvement, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Tamsin FordChild Mental Health Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Vashti BerryChild Mental Health Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Erin WalkerCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
Isobel HeymanCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
Christopher DickensPsychological Medicine, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Sophie BennettGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Roz ShafranGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Ruth GarsideEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 10/140/02Department of Health 14/157/06Medical Research Council G108/625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren and young people with long-term physical health conditions are at increased risk of experiencing mental health and well-being difficulties. However, there is a lack of research that explores the experiences of and attitudes towards interventions aiming to improve their mental health and well-being. This systematic review seeks to address this gap in the literature by exploring what children and young people with long-term conditions, their caregivers, and health practitioners perceive to be important aspects of interventions aiming to improve their mental health and well-being.

methodsAn information specialist searched five academic databases using predefined criteria for qualitative evaluations of interventions aiming to improve the mental health or well-being of children with long-term physical conditions. Reviewers also performed supplementary citation and grey literature searches. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts that met the inclusion criteria and conducted data extraction and quality assessment. Meta-ethnography was used to synthesize the findings.

resultsScreening identified 60 relevant articles. We identified five overarching constructs through the synthesis: (a) Getting In and Staying In, (b) Therapeutic Foundation, (c) Social Support, (d) A Hopeful Alternative, and (e) Empowerment. The line of argument that links these constructs together indicates that when interventions can provide an environment that allows young people to share their experiences and build empathetic relationships, it can enable participants to access social support and increase feelings of hope and empowerment.

conclusionThese findings may provide a framework to inform the development of mental health interventions for this population and evaluate existing interventions that already include some of the components or processes identified by this research. Further research is needed to establish which of the constructs identified by the line of argument are most effective in improving the mental well-being of young people living with long-term conditions.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAnthropology, CulturalChildChronic DiseaseHealth PromotionHumansLong-Term CareQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeResilience, PsychologicalSocial EnvironmentSocial Supportchildreninterventionlong-term conditionmental healthqualitative research methodssystematic reviewwell-being

Identifiers

PMID31339591
PMCPMC6851835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.