Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31339549›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

End-of-Life Care Received by Physicians Compared With Nonphysicians.

Hannah Wunsch, Damon Scales, Hayley B Gershengorn, May Hua, Andrea D Hill, Longdi Fu, Therese A Stukel, Gordon Rubenfeld, Robert A Fowler

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [When the one who heals dies. The physician at the end of life].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. "Don't Talk to Them About Goals of Care": Understanding Disparities in Advance Care Planning.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. When Intensive Care Becomes Good End-of-Life Care.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah WunschDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Damon ScalesInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hayley B GershengornDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
May HuaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea D HillDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Longdi FuICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Therese A StukelICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gordon RubenfeldInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robert A FowlerInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CAAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USColumbia University · USInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

Determinants of Critical Care Intensity for Hospitalized Older Adults: the Effect of Hospital-based Palliative Care ServicesK08AG051184 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUA, MAY · 2015 to 2019
$863k
CIHRNIA NIH HHS K08 AG051184NIA NIH HHS L30 AG053861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The idea that physicians as patients choose less-aggressive care at the end of life for themselves is an often-cited rationale to advocate for less technology-laden end-of-life care. Objective: To assess end-of-life care received by physicians compared with nonphysicians in a system with universal health care. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this population-level decedent cohort study of data from April 1, 2004, through March 31, 2015 (fiscal years 2004-2014), in Ontario, Canada, 2507 physicians were matched approximately 1:3 to 7513 nonphysicians (ie, individuals who never were registered as a physician with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) according to age, sex, income quintile, and location of residence. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was location of death. Other outcomes included measures of health care use in the last 6 months of life. Differences were assessed using Poisson regression with robust error variances, adjusting for the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Results: In total, 2516 physicians and 954 836 nonphysicians died between April 1, 2004, and March 31, 2015, in Ontario; 2247 physicians (89.3%) and 474 182 nonphysicians (49.7%) were men. The median (interquartile range) age at death was 82 (74-87) years for the physicians and 80 (68-87) years for the nonphysicians. After matching, data for 2507 physicians and 7513 nonphysicians were analyzed. For physicians, the risk of death at home was no different from that for nonphysicians (42.8% vs 39.0%; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.99-1.09), but the risk of death in an intensive care unit was increased (11.9% vs 10.0%; aRR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39). In the prior 6 months, physicians had a decreased risk of an emergency department visit (73.0% vs 78.4%; aRR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98) but increased risks of an intensive care unit admission (20.8% vs 19.1%; aRR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24) and of receipt of palliative care services (52.9% vs 47.4%; aRR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13-1.23). Among a subgroup of 457 physicians and 1347 nonphysicians with cancer, the risk of death at home or intensive care unit was increased (37.6% vs 28.6%; aRR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.13-1.50), as was the risk of receiving chemotherapy in the last 6 months of life. Conclusions and Relevance: There was no difference overall for physicians compared with nonphysicians in terms of the likelihood of dying at home; physicians were more likely to die in an intensive care unit and to receive chemotherapy, but also to receive palliative care services. These findings suggest that physicians do not consistently opt for less-aggressive care but instead receive end-of-life care that includes both intensive and palliative care. These findings inform a more nuanced perspective of what physicians may perceive to be optimal care at the end of life.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDelivery of Health CareEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleOntarioPalliative CarePhysiciansPoisson DistributionRegression AnalysisTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID31339549
PMCPMC6659139
OpenAlexW2962909772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.