Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31339548›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Serological Markers Associated With Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Metastatic Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer.

Zhihao Lu, Jianling Zou, Ying Hu, Shuang Li, Tao Zhou, Jifang Gong, Jian Li, Xiaotian Zhang, Jun Zhou, Ming Lu and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Harnessing biomarkers to guide immunotherapy in esophageal cancer: toward precision oncology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhihao LuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Jianling ZouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Ying HuGenecast Precision Medicine Technology Institute, Beijing, China.
Shuang LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Tao ZhouGenecast Precision Medicine Technology Institute, Beijing, China.
Jifang GongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Jian LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiaotian ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Jun ZhouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Ming LuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Xicheng WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Zhi PengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Changsong QiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Yanyan LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Yan LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Jianyin ZouDepartment of Otolaryngology, Otolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xiao DuGenecast Precision Medicine Technology Institute, Beijing, China.
Henghui ZhangGenecast Precision Medicine Technology Institute, Beijing, China.
Lin ShenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University Cancer Hospital · CNBeijing Ditan Hospital · CNGenecast (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There are a limited number of predictive biomarkers for hyperprogressive disease (HPD), which is induced by immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. Objective: To evaluate the association of biomarkers in serum with the response to ICB therapy in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal tract cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cohort study in which patients with metastatic gastrointestinal tract cancer treated with ICB were enrolled at the Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China, from August 1, 2015, to July 31, 2017, with the last follow-up date on January 1, 2018. Serum samples were collected at baseline and during the first visit to the clinic after starting treatment. Data analysis was conducted from January 16, 2018, to September 1, 2018. Exposures: A total of 59 factors, including cytokines/chemokines, growth factors, and soluble checkpoint-related proteins in serum, were examined by multiplexed bead immunoassays. Main Outcomes and Measures: Tree-based estimators were used to evaluate the importance of serum protein levels to ICB treatment response. Progression-free survival and overall survival analyses were conducted with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: In total, 56 patients were examined. All patients with HPD (5 [8.9%]) had significantly lower mean (SD) levels of serum monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 than patients without HPD at baseline (53.4 [17.3] pg/mL vs 106.4 [48.4] pg/mL; P = .02). All patients with HPD were also identified by lower leukemia inhibitory factor levels (<13.28 pg/mL) and higher cluster of differentiation 152 levels (≥31.81 pg/mL). Among the remaining 51 patients, responders with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) showed larger decreases in interleukin 1 receptor antagonist levels than nonresponders (ESCC: -55.02% [95% CI, -86.52% to -23.51%] vs 43.44% [95% CI, 11.93% to 74.96%]; P < .001; CRC: -35.82% [95% CI, -67.38% to -4.26%] vs 59.14% [95% CI, -72.34% to 190.6%]; P = .04). Responders with gastric cancer (GC) had larger increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels than nonresponders (44.77% [95% CI, 10.76% to 78.79%] vs -26.2% [95% CI, -58.53% to 6.12%]; P = .003). Furthermore, early decreases in serum interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in patients with metastatic ESCC and CRC were associated with longer progression-free survival (ESCC: not reached vs 2.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.95; P = .04; CRC: not reached vs 2.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.38; P < .001). Early increases in brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in patients with metastatic GC were associated with longer progression-free survival (not reached vs 4.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.84; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, baseline serum levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, leukemia inhibitory factor, and cluster of differentiation 152 were associated with hyperprogressive metastatic gastrointestinal cancer among patients receiving ICB. An early decrease in serum interleukin 1 receptor antagonist levels in patients with metastatic ESCC or CRC and an early increase in serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in patients with metastatic GC were better able to identify who would respond to ICB compared with microsatellite stability status or programmed cell death ligand 1 expression.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle CheckpointsChinaCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID31339548
PMCPMC6659353
OpenAlexW2968246104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.