Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31339541›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2019

Trends in Medical Imaging During Pregnancy in the United States and Ontario, Canada, 1996 to 2016.

Marilyn L Kwan, Diana L Miglioretti, Emily C Marlow, E J Aiello Bowles, Sheila Weinmann, Stephanie Y Cheng, Kamala A Deosaransingh, Prachi Chavan, Lisa M Moy, Wesley E Bolch and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Effects of ionizing radiation exposure during pregnancy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Article
  6. Antenatal imaging: A pictorial review.World journal of clinical cases · 2022
    Review
  7. Magnetic resonance imaging of the monkey fetal brain in utero.Investigative magnetic resonance imaging · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Pulmonary Considerations for Pregnant Women.Clinics in chest medicine · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Imaging in Pregnancy Stewardship.Obstetric medicine · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Marilyn L KwanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Diana L MigliorettiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis.
Emily C MarlowDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis.
E J Aiello BowlesKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle.
Sheila WeinmannCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon.
Stephanie Y ChengICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kamala A DeosaransinghDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Prachi ChavanDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.
Lisa M MoyDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Wesley E BolchDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville.
James R DuncanInterventional Radiology Section, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Robert T GreenleeMarshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin.
Lawrence H KushiDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Jason D PoleICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alanna K RahmCenter for Health Research, Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Natasha K StoutDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
R Smith-BindmanDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.
Radiation-Induced Cancers Study Team
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USHarvard University · USInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USMarshfield Clinic · USPediatric Oncology Group · CAUniversity of Florida · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

CRN4: Cancer Research Resources & Collaboration in Integrated Health Care SystemsU24CA171524 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KUSHI, LAWRENCE H · 2012 to 2016
$16.0M
Risk of Pediatric and Adolescent Cancer Associated with Medical ImagingR01CA185687 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KWAN, MARILYN L, MIGLIORETTI, DIANA L · 2015 to 2019
$10.0M
Group Health Cancer Research Program Research Specialist AwardR50CA211115 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BOWLES, ERIN JANELLE AIELLO · 2017 to 2021
$919k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA185687NCI NIH HHS R50 CA211115NCI NIH HHS U24 CA171524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The use of medical imaging has sharply increased over the last 2 decades. Imaging rates during pregnancy have not been quantified in a large, multisite study setting. Objective: To evaluate patterns of medical imaging during pregnancy. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was performed at 6 US integrated health care systems and in Ontario, Canada. Participants included pregnant women who gave birth to a live neonate of at least 24 weeks' gestation between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2016, and who were enrolled in the health care system for the entire pregnancy. Exposures: Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography, angiography and fluoroscopy, and nuclear medicine. Main Outcomes and Measures: Imaging rates per pregnancy stratified by country and year of child's birth. Results: A total of 3 497 603 pregnancies in 2 211 789 women were included. Overall, 26% of pregnancies were from US sites. Most (92%) were in women aged 20 to 39 years, and 85% resulted in full-term births. Computed tomography imaging rates in the United States increased from 2.0 examinations/1000 pregnancies in 1996 to 11.4/1000 pregnancies in 2007, remained stable through 2010, and decreased to 9.3/1000 pregnancies by 2016, for an overall increase of 3.7-fold. Computed tomography rates in Ontario, Canada, increased more gradually by 2.0-fold, from 2.0/1000 pregnancies in 1996 to 6.2/1000 pregnancies in 2016, which was 33% lower than in the United States. Overall, 5.3% of pregnant women in US sites and 3.6% in Ontario underwent imaging with ionizing radiation, and 0.8% of women at US sites and 0.4% in Ontario underwent CT. Magnetic resonance imaging rates increased steadily from 1.0/1000 pregnancies in 1996 to 11.9/1000 pregnancies in 2016 in the United States and from 0.5/1000 pregnancies in 1996 to 9.8/1000 pregnancies in 2016 in Ontario, surpassing CT rates in 2013 in the United States and in 2007 in Ontario. In the United States, radiography rates doubled from 34.5/1000 pregnancies in 1996 to 72.6/1000 pregnancies in 1999 and then decreased to 47.6/1000 pregnancies in 2016; rates in Ontario slowly increased from 36.2/1000 pregnancies in 1996 to 44.7/1000 pregnancies in 2016. Angiography and fluoroscopy and nuclear medicine use rates were low (5.2/1000 pregnancies), but in most years, higher in Ontario than the United States. Imaging rates were highest for women who were younger than 20 years or aged 40 years or older, gave birth preterm, or were black, Native American, or Hispanic (US data only). Considering advanced imaging only, chest imaging of pregnant women was more likely to use CT in the United States and nuclear medicine imaging in Ontario. Conclusions and Relevance: The use of CT during pregnancy substantially increased in the United States and Ontario over the past 2 decades. Imaging rates during pregnancy should be monitored to avoid unnecessary exposure of women and fetuses to ionizing radiation.

Indexed as

AdultDiagnostic ImagingFemaleGestational AgeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingOntarioPregnancyPrenatal CareRadiation, IonizingRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31339541
PMCPMC6659354
OpenAlexW2963727688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.