Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31339177›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2019

Artificial selection on brain size leads to matching changes in overall number of neurons.

Lucie Marhounová, Alexander Kotrschal, Kristina Kverková, Niclas Kolm, Pavel Němec

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Visual field map size constrains working memory precision.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Specialization of male reproductive tactics corresponds with large gonads and small brains.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The fish challenge to vertebrate cognitive evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The evolution of brain neuron numbers in amniotes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Lucie MarhounováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 12844, Prague, Czech Republic.
Alexander KotrschalBehavioural Ecology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, 6708wd, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3473-1402
Kristina KverkováDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 12844, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4579-6861
Niclas KolmDepartment of Zoology/Ethology, Stockholm University, 10691, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5791-336X
Pavel NěmecDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 12844, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0277-0239
Charles University · CZStockholm University · SE

Funding

Austrian Science Fund J3304-B24Grantová Agentura České Republiky 18-15020SGrantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova 1502317Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse 1022013.0072Vetenskapsrådet 2012-03624Vetenskapsrådet 2016-03435Vetenskapsrådet 2017-04957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons are the basic computational units of the brain, but brain size is the predominant surrogate measure of brain functional capacity in comparative and cognitive neuroscience. This approach is based on the assumption that larger brains harbor higher numbers of neurons and their connections, and therefore have a higher information-processing capacity. However, recent studies have shown that brain mass may be less strongly correlated with neuron counts than previously thought. Till now, no experimental test has been conducted to examine the relationship between evolutionary changes in brain size and the number of brain neurons. Here, we provide such a test by comparing neuron number in artificial selection lines of female guppies (Poecilia reticulata) with >15% difference in relative brain mass and numerous previously demonstrated cognitive differences. Using the isotropic fractionator, we demonstrate that large-brained females have a higher overall number of neurons than small-brained females, but similar neuronal densities. Importantly, this difference holds also for the telencephalon, a key region for cognition. Our study provides the first direct experimental evidence that selection for brain mass leads to matching changes in number of neurons and shows that brain size evolution is intimately linked to the evolution of neuron number and cognition.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticAnimalsBiological EvolutionBrainCognitionFemaleModels, NeurologicalNeuronsOrgan SizePoeciliaArtificial selectionbrain sizecognitionisotropic fractionatornumber of neurons

Identifiers

PMID31339177
PMCPMC6772110
OpenAlexW2964003861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.