ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2019
Shared decision-making in maternity care: Acknowledging and overcoming epistemic defeaters.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of a complex intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Trial
- Telling Not Asking: A Framework Method Analysis of Shared Decision-Making in Antenatal Clinic Consultations.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2026Article
- Equity and Inclusion: A Review of NHS and HSC Online Information for Women in the Early Phase of Labour.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reliability and Validity of the MADM Scale in Measuring Maternal Autonomy During Hospital Births in Greece.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Decision-Making and Knowledge Around Inductions of Labor: A Survey Study in Ireland.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2026Article
- Women's Autonomy in Obstetric Care: A Qualitative Study on Violations and Experiences.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Migrant Mums and Maternity Care: A Qualitative Participatory Health Research Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Article
- Women's Perceptions of Cultural Sensitivity of Midwives During Intrapartum Care in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Discrimination, racism, and bias in childbirth pain management in the United States: a scoping review and directions for research and clinical care.International journal of obstetric anesthesia · 2025Article
- Qualitative Study of Maternity Healthcare Vulnerability Based on Women's Experiences in Different Sociocultural Context.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- A qualitative description of birth trauma experiences from Ireland's first psychological birth trauma clinic.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Respectful maternity care and mistreatment: Women's experiences during induction of labor and childbirth in Ghana.PloS one · 2025Article
- The TouCAN Codebook: Detecting textual misunderstanding in doctor-patient communication with the philosophy of language tools.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Disability justice and collective access to labour and delivery care: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Co-creation of a health literate-sensitive training and conversation aid to support shared decision-making in maternity care.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Shared Decision-Making and Body Mass Index in Australian Antenatal Care: An Exploratory OPTION12 Evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Maternity healthcare professionals' experiences of supporting women in decision-making for labour and birth: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Shared Decision Making in Perinatal Care.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shared decision-making involves health professionals and patients/clients working together to achieve true person-centred health care. However, this goal is infrequently realized, and most barriers are unknown. Discussion between philosophers, clinicians, and researchers can assist in confronting the epistemic and moral basis of health care, with benefits to all. The aim of this paper is to describe what shared decision-making is, discuss its necessary conditions, and develop a definition that can be used in practice to support excellence in maternity care. Discussion between the authors, with backgrounds in philosophy, clinical maternity care, health care management, and maternity care research, assisted the team to confront established norms in maternity care and challenge the epistemic and moral basis of decision-making for caesarean section. The team concluded that shared decision-making must start in pregnancy and continue throughout labour and birth, with equality in discourse facilitated by the clinician. Clinicians have a duty of care for the adequacy of women's knowledge, which can only be fulfilled when relevant knowledge is offered freely and when personal beliefs and biases that may impinge on decision-making (defeaters) are disclosed. Informed consent is not shared decision-making. Key barriers include existing cultural norms of "the doctor knows best" and "patient acquiescence" that prevent defeaters being acknowledged and discussed and can lead to legal challenges, overuse of medical intervention and, in some areas, obstetric violence. Shared decision-making in maternity care can thus be defined as an enquiry by clinician and expectant woman aimed at deciding upon a course of care or none, which takes the form of a dialogue within which the clinician fulfils their duty of care to the client's knowledge by making available their complete knowledge (based on all types of evidence) and expertise, including an exposition of any relevant and recognized potential defeaters. Research to develop measurement tools is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.