Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31338953›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2019

Shared decision-making in maternity care: Acknowledging and overcoming epistemic defeaters.

Keith Begley, Deirdre Daly, Sunita Panda, Cecily Begley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Migrant Mums and Maternity Care: A Qualitative Participatory Health Research Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Shared Decision-Making and Body Mass Index in Australian Antenatal Care: An Exploratory OPTION12 Evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Shared Decision Making in Perinatal Care.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Keith BegleyDepartment of Philosophy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1448-4344
Deirdre DalySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3045-9894
Sunita PandaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2308-1045
Cecily BegleySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2240-8763

Funding

Health Research Board, Ireland HPF-2016-1671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared decision-making involves health professionals and patients/clients working together to achieve true person-centred health care. However, this goal is infrequently realized, and most barriers are unknown. Discussion between philosophers, clinicians, and researchers can assist in confronting the epistemic and moral basis of health care, with benefits to all. The aim of this paper is to describe what shared decision-making is, discuss its necessary conditions, and develop a definition that can be used in practice to support excellence in maternity care. Discussion between the authors, with backgrounds in philosophy, clinical maternity care, health care management, and maternity care research, assisted the team to confront established norms in maternity care and challenge the epistemic and moral basis of decision-making for caesarean section. The team concluded that shared decision-making must start in pregnancy and continue throughout labour and birth, with equality in discourse facilitated by the clinician. Clinicians have a duty of care for the adequacy of women's knowledge, which can only be fulfilled when relevant knowledge is offered freely and when personal beliefs and biases that may impinge on decision-making (defeaters) are disclosed. Informed consent is not shared decision-making. Key barriers include existing cultural norms of "the doctor knows best" and "patient acquiescence" that prevent defeaters being acknowledged and discussed and can lead to legal challenges, overuse of medical intervention and, in some areas, obstetric violence. Shared decision-making in maternity care can thus be defined as an enquiry by clinician and expectant woman aimed at deciding upon a course of care or none, which takes the form of a dialogue within which the clinician fulfils their duty of care to the client's knowledge by making available their complete knowledge (based on all types of evidence) and expertise, including an exposition of any relevant and recognized potential defeaters. Research to develop measurement tools is required.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedCesarean SectionHumansMaternal Health ServicesPatient ParticipationPatient PreferencePhysician-Patient Relationscaesarean sectionduty of careevidence-based knowledgeobstetric violencephilosophyshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID31338953
PMCPMC6899916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.