Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31338760›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Does agricultural value added induce environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from an agrarian country.

Mary Oluwatoyin Agboola, Festus Victor Bekun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Moderation of Services' EKC through Transportation Competitiveness: PQR Model in Global Prospective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Does agriculture-induced environmental Kuznets curve exist in developing countries?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Study on the impact of environmental pollution on farmland abandonment.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Do agriculture activities matter for environmental Kuznets curve in the Next Eleven countries?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  12. Does agricultural development induce environmental pollution in E7? A myth or reality.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  13. Influence of FDI characteristics on high-quality development of China's economy.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  14. Does the environmental Kuznets curve reliably explain a developmental issue?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  15. Environmental implications of N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve for E7 countries.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  16. Analyzing the spatial network structure of agricultural greenhouse gases in China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Value addition in the services sector and its heterogeneous impacts on COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Dynamic relationship among agriculture-energy-forestry and carbon dioxide (COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mary Oluwatoyin AgboolaFinance and Banking Department, College of Business Dar Al Uloom University, 1 Mizan St., Al Falah, Riyadh, 13314, Saudi Arabia.
Festus Victor BekunEastern Mediterranean University, via Mersin 10, Northern Cyprus, Turkey. festus.bekun@emu.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study empirically investigates the agriculture-induced environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in an agrarian framework. Annual time series data from 1981-2014 was employed using augmented Dickey-Fuller and the Phillips-Perron (PP) unit root test complemented by the Zivot and Andrews unit root that accounts for a single structural break to ascertain stationarity properties of variables under consideration. For the cointegration analysis, an autoregressive distributive lag methodology and the recent novel Bayer and Hanck combined cointegration technique are employed. For the direction of causality, the Granger causality test is used as estimation technique. Empirical findings lend support for the long-run equilibrium relationship among the variables under consideration. This study also validates the inverted U-shaped pattern of EKC for the case of Nigeria, affirming that Nigeria remains at the scale-effect stage of its growth trajectory. Further empirical results show that foreign direct investment attraction helps mitigate carbon emissions in Nigeria. Based on these results, several policy prescriptions on the Nigeria energy mix and agricultural operations in response to quality of the environment were suggested for policymakers, stakeholders, and environmental economists that formulate and design environmental regulations and strategies to realise the goal 7 of sustainable development (SDG).

Indexed as

AgricultureCarbon DioxideEconomic DevelopmentInternationalityInvestmentsNigeriaPolicyCarbon DioxideAgriculture ecosystemEKCEnergy consumptionGranger causalityNigeria

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.